Kokkinakis and the Narratives of Proper and Improper Proselytizing
This article explores how the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) distinguishes between proper and improper proselytizing. It points out the importance of the competing factual narratives and how the way the facts are presented can determine how the Court responds to the proselytizing activity.
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill, Nijhoff
2017
|
| Dans: |
Religion and human rights
Année: 2017, Volume: 12, Numéro: 2/3, Pages: 99-111 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Kokkinakis
proselytizing
proselyting
proper proselyting
improper proselytism
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)
Article 9
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Résumé: | This article explores how the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) distinguishes between proper and improper proselytizing. It points out the importance of the competing factual narratives and how the way the facts are presented can determine how the Court responds to the proselytizing activity. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1871-0328 |
| Contient: | In: Religion and human rights
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/18710328-12231156 |