Divine Sparks and Abraham: a major difference
Gavin D’Costa defends the continuity of Nostra Aetate with centuries of Catholic teaching. This may be true, but any religion will emphasize continuity with the past when it comes to authoritative documents. In this case some elements in Nostra Aetate contain a genuine renewal such as the grouping t...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic/Print Review |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
[publisher not identified]
[2017]
|
In: |
Louvain studies
Year: 2017, Volume: 40, Issue: 3, Pages: 249-259 |
Review of: | Vatican II (Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2014) (Poorthuis, Marcel)
|
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Vatican Council 2. (1962-1965 : Vatikanstadt), Nostra aetate
/ Vatican Council 2. (1962-1965 : Vatikanstadt), Lumen gentium
/ Catholic church
/ Judaism
/ Islam
|
RelBib Classification: | BH Judaism BJ Islam CC Christianity and Non-Christian religion; Inter-religious relations KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history KDB Roman Catholic Church |
Further subjects: | B
Book review
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | Gavin D’Costa defends the continuity of Nostra Aetate with centuries of Catholic teaching. This may be true, but any religion will emphasize continuity with the past when it comes to authoritative documents. In this case some elements in Nostra Aetate contain a genuine renewal such as the grouping together of Islam and Judaism as religions going back to Abraham, which should be distinguished from the ‘divine sparks’ to be found in other religions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0024-6964 |
Reference: | Kritik in "A Response to the Essays (2017)"
|
Contains: | Enthalten in: Louvain studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2143/LS.40.3.3245490 |