Arbitrariness, Irrationality, and the Sterility Objection: A Reply to Anderson

Does the contemporary Natural Law position that only heterosexual couples are capable of marriage rest upon an “arbitrary and irrational distinction between same-sex couples and sterile heterosexual couples?” Anderson (Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (4):759-775, 2013: 759). There are many who...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tully, Patrick Andrew (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V [2015]
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2015, Volume: 18, Issue: 1, Pages: 135-144
RelBib Classification:NBE Anthropology
NCF Sexual ethics
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B Natural Law Marriage Sterility objection
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1565664906
003 DE-627
005 20171123165318.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 171123s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10677-014-9513-0  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1565664906 
035 |a (DE-576)495664901 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ495664901 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1146868928  |0 (DE-627)1008295523  |0 (DE-576)257948562  |4 aut  |a Tully, Patrick Andrew 
109 |a Tully, Patrick Andrew 
245 1 0 |a Arbitrariness, Irrationality, and the Sterility Objection  |b A Reply to Anderson  |c Patrick A. Tully 
264 1 |c [2015] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Does the contemporary Natural Law position that only heterosexual couples are capable of marriage rest upon an “arbitrary and irrational distinction between same-sex couples and sterile heterosexual couples?” Anderson (Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (4):759-775, 2013: 759). There are many who think so. In a recent article in these pages, Erik Anderson offers his case that these critics are correct. In what follows I examine Anderson’s argument and conclude that, whether or not one ultimately agrees with the New Natural Law account of marriage, the distinction found there between same sex couples and sterile heterosexual couples is neither arbitrary nor irrational. 
650 4 |a Natural Law  |x Marriage  |x Sterility objection 
652 |a NBE:NCF:VA 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 18(2015), 1, Seite 135-144  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:18  |g year:2015  |g number:1  |g pages:135-144 
856 4 0 |u https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10677-014-9513-0  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-014-9513-0  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2988014434 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1565664906 
LOK |0 005 20191031111611 
LOK |0 008 171123||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205168X  |a NBE 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052961  |a NCF 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL