Social Epistemic Liberalism and the Problem of Deep Epistemic Disagreements
Recently Robert B. Talisse has put forth a socio-epistemic justification of liberal democracy that he believes qualifies as a public justification in that it purportedly can be endorsed by all reasonable individuals. In avoiding narrow restraints on reasonableness, Talisse argues that he has in fact...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2015]
|
In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2015, Volume: 18, Issue: 2, Pages: 371-384 |
RelBib Classification: | NCD Political ethics VA Philosophy ZC Politics in general |
Further subjects: | B
Pluralism
B Epistemic disagreements B Liberalism B Public justification B Talisse |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |