Propping Up the Collapsing Principle

According to a standard account of incomparability, two value bearers are incomparable if it is false that there holds a positive value relation between them. Due to the vagueness of the comparative predicates it may also be indeterminate as to which relation that holds - for each relation it is nei...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andersson, Henrik (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V [2015]
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2015, Volume: 18, Issue: 3, Pages: 475-486
RelBib Classification:VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy
Further subjects:B Erik Carlson
B Incomparability
B Cristian Constantinescu
B Value comparison
B Vagueness
B The collapsing principle
B Indeterminacy
B Johan F. Gustafsson
B John Broome
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1565679687
003 DE-627
005 20180731121621.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 171123s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10677-014-9533-9  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1565679687 
035 |a (DE-576)495679682 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ495679682 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Andersson, Henrik  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Propping Up the Collapsing Principle  |c Henrik Andersson 
264 1 |c [2015] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a According to a standard account of incomparability, two value bearers are incomparable if it is false that there holds a positive value relation between them. Due to the vagueness of the comparative predicates it may also be indeterminate as to which relation that holds - for each relation it is neither true nor false that it holds. John Broome has argued that indeterminacy cannot coexist with incomparability and since there seems to exist indeterminacy there cannot exist incomparability. At the core of his argument lies the collapsing principle. There are several arguments against this principle; Erik Carlson has advanced most of these. In this paper two strategies in dealing with these arguments are discussed. One strategy is to deny the existence of a certain kind of properties; another strategy that has been advanced by Christian Constantinescu is to restrict the collapsing principle. In the paper it is argued that the first of these strategies is the most promising strategy. A novel argument in favour of this strategy is presented and several objections to the strategy are rebutted. Finally it is concluded that, even though this strategy deals with most objections, without a better argument in favour of the principle the debate seems to run into a stalemate. 
650 4 |a Cristian Constantinescu 
650 4 |a Erik Carlson 
650 4 |a Incomparability 
650 4 |a Indeterminacy 
650 4 |a Johan F. Gustafsson 
650 4 |a John Broome 
650 4 |a The collapsing principle 
650 4 |a Vagueness 
650 4 |a Value comparison 
652 |a VB 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 18(2015), 3, Seite 475-486  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:18  |g year:2015  |g number:3  |g pages:475-486 
856 4 0 |u https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10677-014-9533-9  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-014-9533-9  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 298803723X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1565679687 
LOK |0 005 20191031121814 
LOK |0 008 171123||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205381X  |a VB 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL