In Defense of the Asymmetric Convergence Model of Public Justification: A Reply to Boettcher
This piece defends the asymmetric convergence model of public justification in response to James Boettchers critique. I maintain both that Boettchers critique of asymmetric convergence fails and that his alternative view, Weak Public Justification, faces a number of serious challenges.
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2016]
|
| In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2016, Volume: 19, Issue: 1, Pages: 255-266 |
| RelBib Classification: | NCD Political ethics VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
public reason
B Political Liberalism B Convergence B Liberalism B Public justification |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1565731484 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20191104091930.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 171127s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10677-015-9605-5 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1565731484 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)49573148X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ49573148X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1135733678 |0 (DE-627)890771332 |0 (DE-576)490078516 |4 aut |a Vallier, Kevin |d 1982- | |
| 109 | |a Vallier, Kevin 1982- |a Vallier, Kevin D. 1982- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a In Defense of the Asymmetric Convergence Model of Public Justification |b A Reply to Boettcher |c Kevin Vallier |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2016] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This piece defends the asymmetric convergence model of public justification in response to James Boettchers critique. I maintain both that Boettchers critique of asymmetric convergence fails and that his alternative view, Weak Public Justification, faces a number of serious challenges. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Convergence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Liberalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Political Liberalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public justification | |
| 650 | 4 | |a public reason | |
| 652 | |a NCD:VA | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Boettcher, James W. |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks |4 ant | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical theory and moral practice |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998 |g 19(2016), 1, Seite 255-266 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320527093 |w (DE-600)2015306-5 |w (DE-576)104558555 |x 1572-8447 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:19 |g year:2016 |g number:1 |g pages:255-266 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik von |a Boettcher, James W. |t Against the Asymmetric Convergence Model of Public Justification |d 2015 |w (DE-627)1565664884 |w (DE-576)49566488X |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10677-015-9605-5 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-015-9605-5 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2988281378 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1565731484 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20191104091930 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 171127||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052856 |a NCD | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||