Human Enhancement, Social Solidarity and the Distribution of Responsibility
This paper tries to clarify, strengthen and respond to two prominent objections to the development and use of human enhancement technologies. Both objections express concerns about the link between enhancement and the drive for hyperagency (i.e. the ability to control and manipulate all aspects of o...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2016]
|
| In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2016, Volume: 19, Issue: 2, Pages: 359-378 |
| RelBib Classification: | NBE Anthropology NCB Personal ethics NCC Social ethics NCJ Ethics of science VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
Hyperagency
B Distribution of responsibility B Solidarity B Giftedness argument B Compliance burdens B Enhancement |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1565743326 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20171127153230.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 171127s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10677-015-9624-2 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1565743326 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)495743321 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ495743321 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1031899413 |0 (DE-627)737511834 |0 (DE-576)37959949X |4 aut |a Danaher, John |d 1967- | |
| 109 | |a Danaher, John 1967- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Human Enhancement, Social Solidarity and the Distribution of Responsibility |c John Danaher |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2016] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper tries to clarify, strengthen and respond to two prominent objections to the development and use of human enhancement technologies. Both objections express concerns about the link between enhancement and the drive for hyperagency (i.e. the ability to control and manipulate all aspects of ones agency). The first derives from the work of Sandel and Hauskellerand is concerned with the negative impact of hyperagency on social solidarity. In responding to their objection, I argue that although social solidarity is valuable, there is a danger in overestimating its value and in neglecting some obvious ways in which the enhancement project can be planned so as to avoid its degradation. The second objection, though common to several writers, has been most directly asserted by Saskia Nagel, and is concerned with the impact of hyperagency on the burden and distribution of responsibility. Though this is an intriguing objection, I argue that not enough has been done to explain why this is morally problematic. I try to correct for this flaw before offering a variety of strategies for dealing with the problems raised. | ||
| 601 | |a Distribution | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Compliance burdens | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Distribution of responsibility | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Enhancement | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Giftedness argument | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Hyperagency | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Solidarity | |
| 652 | |a NBE:NCB:NCC:NCJ:VA | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical theory and moral practice |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998 |g 19(2016), 2, Seite 359-378 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320527093 |w (DE-600)2015306-5 |w (DE-576)104558555 |x 1572-8447 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:19 |g year:2016 |g number:2 |g pages:359-378 |
| 856 | |u https://philpapers.org/archive/DANHES.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10677-015-9624-2 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-015-9624-2 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2988302227 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1565743326 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20191104101947 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 171127||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205168X |a NBE | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736582 |a NCJ | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205283X |a NCC | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052813 |a NCB | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Enhancement |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Amélioration humaine |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Mejoramiento humano |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Enhancement <etica medica>,Potenziamento (etica medica),Potenziamento |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 神經增強 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Melhoramento humano |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Улучшение (медицинская этика) |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ενίσχυση <ιατρική ηθική>,Βελτίωση (ιατρική ηθική),Ενδυνάμωση (ιατρική ηθική) |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Human enhancement |