Mandatory Disclosure and Medical Paternalism

Medical practitioners are duty-bound to tell their patients the truth about their medical conditions, along with the risks and benefits of proposed treatments. Some patients, however, would rather not receive medical information. A recent response to this tension has been to argue that that the disc...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ethical theory and moral practice
Main Author: Bullock, Emma C. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V [2016]
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2016, Volume: 19, Issue: 2, Pages: 409-424
RelBib Classification:NCH Medical ethics
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B Informed Consent
B Paternalism
B Epistemic paternalism
B patient autonomy
B The right not to know
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1565743377
003 DE-627
005 20171127152012.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 171127s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10677-015-9632-2  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1565743377 
035 |a (DE-576)495743372 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ495743372 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Bullock, Emma C.  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Mandatory Disclosure and Medical Paternalism  |c Emma C. Bullock 
264 1 |c [2016] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Medical practitioners are duty-bound to tell their patients the truth about their medical conditions, along with the risks and benefits of proposed treatments. Some patients, however, would rather not receive medical information. A recent response to this tension has been to argue that that the disclosure of medical information is not optional. As such, patients do not have permission to refuse medical information. In this paper I argue that, depending on the context, the disclosure of medical information can undermine the patient’s ability to exercise her autonomy or have therapeutically detrimental effects. In the light of these insights I go on to develop a context-sensitive approach to medical disclosure. The advantage of this account is that it addresses concerns on both sides of the debate; whilst it acknowledges that patients do not have an exercisable ‘right not to know,’ it allows that in some cases medical information ought to be withheld. 
650 4 |a Epistemic paternalism 
650 4 |a Informed Consent 
650 4 |a Paternalism 
650 4 |a patient autonomy 
650 4 |a The right not to know 
652 |a NCH:VA 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 19(2016), 2, Seite 409-424  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:19  |g year:2016  |g number:2  |g pages:409-424 
856 4 0 |u https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10677-015-9632-2  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-015-9632-2  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 19  |j 2016  |e 2  |h 409-424 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2988302278 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1565743377 
LOK |0 005 20191104103403 
LOK |0 008 171127||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736558  |a NCH 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL