Religious Conversion: Classic and Contemporary Questions and Issues
This essay offers a review of Lewis Rambo and Charles Farhadian's The Oxford Handbook of Religious Conversion (2014) in light of Lewis Rambo's previous work on religious conversion, especially his Understanding Religious Conversion (1993). Classic and contemporary questions and issues in c...
| Publié dans: | Pastoral psychology |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Collaborateurs: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Review |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Springer Science Business Media B. V.
2016
|
| Dans: |
Pastoral psychology
|
| Compte rendu de: | The Oxford handbook of religious conversion (Oxford [u.a.] : Oxford Univ. Press, 2014) (Carlin, Nathan)
|
| RelBib Classification: | AA Sciences des religions AE Psychologie de la religion |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Conversion studies
B Psychological aspects B PROTESTANT doctrines B Spirituality B Religious Studies B Compte-rendu de lecture B William James B RELIGIOUS psychology B psychology of religion B Religious Conversion B Reductionism B CONVERSION (Religion) |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | This essay offers a review of Lewis Rambo and Charles Farhadian's The Oxford Handbook of Religious Conversion (2014) in light of Lewis Rambo's previous work on religious conversion, especially his Understanding Religious Conversion (1993). Classic and contemporary questions and issues in conversion studies are noted. The Oxford Handbook of Religious Conversion is also engaged from the perspective of the author's own work, as well as several passages from the work of William James. This essay concludes by suggesting that The Oxford Handbook of Religious Conversion will remain a foundation upon which the field of conversion studies can continue to build for decades to come. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1573-6679 |
| Référence: | Kritik in "Response to Handbook Reviewers (2016)"
|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Pastoral psychology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11089-014-0634-0 |