The Mindreading Debate and the Cognitive Science of Religion
The relationship between understanding other natural minds, often labeled mindreading, and putative understanding of the supernatural is a critical one for the dialogue centering on the cognitive science of religion (CSR). A basic tenet of much of CSR is that cognitive mechanisms that typically op...
| Published in: | Sophia |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Netherlands
[2015]
|
| In: |
Sophia
|
| RelBib Classification: | AA Study of religion AE Psychology of religion |
| Further subjects: | B
Mindreading
B HADD B cognitive science of religion B Kognitive Religionswissenschaft |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | The relationship between understanding other natural minds, often labeled mindreading, and putative understanding of the supernatural is a critical one for the dialogue centering on the cognitive science of religion (CSR). A basic tenet of much of CSR is that cognitive mechanisms that typically operate in the natural domain are co-opted so as to generate representations of the extra-natural. The most important mechanisms invoked are, arguably, the ones that detect agency, represent actions, predicate beliefs and desires of others, and track social hierarchies, coalitions, and exchanges. In this essay, I show that where one lands on the interdisciplinary debate over the nature of mindreading has a significant impact on parts of CSR that invoke social cognition. I focus my essay on the case of CSR explanations of religious experiences in terms of a hyperactive agency detective device (HADD). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1873-930X |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11841-014-0450-0 |