The Affective Subject: Emmanuel Levinas and Michel Henry on the Role of Affect in the Constitution of Subjectivity
In this essay, I develop an affective account of subjectivity that draws on two important philosophers within the phenomenological tradition. Many claim that the philosophies of Emmanuel Levinas and Michel Henry are entirely opposed to one another. Levinas is typically thought of as a philosopher of...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Netherlands
[2017]
|
In: |
Sophia
Year: 2017, Volume: 56, Issue: 1, Pages: 99-114 |
RelBib Classification: | TK Recent history VA Philosophy |
Further subjects: | B
Emmanuel Levinas
B Subjectivity B Michel Henry B Affect |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1565884833 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20171130110211.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 171130s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11841-015-0509-6 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1565884833 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)495884839 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ495884839 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Lupo, Joshua |4 aut | |
109 | |a Lupo, Joshua | ||
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Affective Subject |b Emmanuel Levinas and Michel Henry on the Role of Affect in the Constitution of Subjectivity |c Joshua Lupo |
264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a In this essay, I develop an affective account of subjectivity that draws on two important philosophers within the phenomenological tradition. Many claim that the philosophies of Emmanuel Levinas and Michel Henry are entirely opposed to one another. Levinas is typically thought of as a philosopher of transcendence, while Henry is typically thought of as a philosopher of immanence. By attending to the role that affect plays in the work of both thinkers, I demonstrate that traces of immanence can be located in Levinas, while traces of transcendence can be located in Henry. What this account shows is that the self, because it is affective, is unique and set apart from the world, but also porous and open to being affected by others. | ||
601 | |a Emmanuel, S. J. | ||
601 | |a Henry, Michel | ||
650 | 4 | |a Emmanuel Levinas | |
650 | 4 | |a Affect | |
650 | 4 | |a Michel Henry | |
650 | 4 | |a Subjectivity | |
652 | |a TK:VA | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Sophia |d Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1962 |g 56(2017), 1, Seite 99-114 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)543988392 |w (DE-600)2386792-9 |w (DE-576)271774215 |x 1873-930X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:56 |g year:2017 |g number:1 |g pages:99-114 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11841-015-0509-6 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-015-0509-6 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 2988491003 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1565884833 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20200629210029 | ||
LOK | |0 008 171130||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053887 |a TK | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |