Case method strategies for teaching sexual ethics to relativists and skeptics
Many undergraduates are culturally shaped to avoid making ethical judgments. They spontaneously adopt relativist and skeptical strategies such as "It all depends," or "Whose morality?" or "Who's to say?" as ways of fending off the challenge of making moral decision...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2017]
|
In: |
Teaching theology and religion
Year: 2017, Volume: 20, Issue: 2, Pages: 126-136 |
RelBib Classification: | FB Theological education NCF Sexual ethics ZF Education |
Further subjects: | B
Sexual ethics
B Character B Relativism B Autonomy B Method B Case |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | Many undergraduates are culturally shaped to avoid making ethical judgments. They spontaneously adopt relativist and skeptical strategies such as "It all depends," or "Whose morality?" or "Who's to say?" as ways of fending off the challenge of making moral decisions. The current tsunami that is washing away traditional sexual norms is both a result and a cause of this cultural shift. Case studies can mitigate this decline and help students to grow in both confidence and ability to make good ethical judgments. The case method, used with a Socratic pedagogy, engages imagination and counters the deficits in empathy found in many contemporary students. It moves students toward understanding morality itself. Against skepticism, it assists students in exercising practical reason, culminating in decision. Five cases invite students to overcome extreme relativism, to look for and evaluate relevant differences, and to enter into ethical discussion with other students on the sexual issues they face in their college years. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1467-9647 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Teaching theology and religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/teth.12375 |