Government Communication as a Normative Practice
The network society is generally challenging for today’s communication practitioners because they are no longer the sole entities responsible for communication processes. This is a major change for many of them. In this paper, it will be contended that the normative practice model as developed withi...
| Auteurs: | ; ; |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
2017
|
| Dans: |
Philosophia reformata
Année: 2017, Volume: 82, Numéro: 2, Pages: 121-145 |
| RelBib Classification: | VA Philosophie ZC Politique en général |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
government communication
normative practice model
reformational philosophy
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Accès probablement gratuit Volltext (Verlag) |
| Résumé: | The network society is generally challenging for today’s communication practitioners because they are no longer the sole entities responsible for communication processes. This is a major change for many of them. In this paper, it will be contended that the normative practice model as developed within reformational philosophy is beneficial for clarifying the structure of communication practices. Based on this model, we argue that government communication should not be considered as primarily an activity that focuses on societal legitimation of policy; rather, it focuses on clarifying the meaning of the actions of the government. If the government can convincingly answer the question about the reason for their actions, societal legitimation will subsequently follow. Hence, it is argued that government communication is primarily linguistically qualified. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2352-8230 |
| Contient: | In: Philosophia reformata
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/23528230-08202004 |