Against Miracles as Law-Violations
Miracles are commonly understood in the way David Hume defined them: as violations of the laws of nature. I argue, however, that the conjunction of Humes definition with a neo-Humean view of the laws of nature yields objectionable consequences. In particular, the two jointly imply that some miracle...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2015]
|
In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2015, Volume: 7, Issue: 4, Pages: 83-98 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Miracle
/ Law of nature
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God |
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |