Religious Diversity: A Philosophical Defense of Religious Inclusivism
Faced by the challenge of religious plurality, most philosophers of religion view pluralism and exclusivism as the most accepted and fully developed positions. The third alternative, the model of inclusivism, held especially within the catholic tradition, has not received adequate attention in the d...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2010]
|
| In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2010, Volume: 2, Issue: 2, Pages: 127-140 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1567180981 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20180115170031.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180115s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.24204/ejpr.v2i2.371 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1567180981 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)497180987 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ497180987 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)121738930 |0 (DE-627)081503024 |0 (DE-576)182338924 |4 aut |a Irlenborn, Bernd |d 1963- | |
| 109 | |a Irlenborn, Bernd 1963- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Religious Diversity |b A Philosophical Defense of Religious Inclusivism |c Bernd Irlenborn |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2010] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Faced by the challenge of religious plurality, most philosophers of religion view pluralism and exclusivism as the most accepted and fully developed positions. The third alternative, the model of inclusivism, held especially within the catholic tradition, has not received adequate attention in the debates in philosophy of religion, perhaps as it is based solely on theological grounds. In this essay I offer a philosophical defense of the position of religious inclusivism and give reasons why this position represents the most appropriate position in the face of conflicting religious truth claims. | ||
| 601 | |a Philosophie | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal for philosophy of religion |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009 |g 2(2010), 2, Seite 127-140 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)718600770 |w (DE-600)2659606-4 |w (DE-576)477533728 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:2 |g year:2010 |g number:2 |g pages:127-140 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1636906621 |k Non-Electronic | ||
| 856 | |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/download/371/342 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/371 |x Verlag |z teilw. kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v2i2.371 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 2 |j 2010 |e 2 |h 127-140 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2992874655 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1567180981 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180115170031 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 180115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||