Descartes' Ontological Proof: An Interpretation and Defense
It is widely assumed among contemporary philosophers that Descartes version of ontological proof, among other weaknesses, makes an impossible and unjustified move from the mental world of concepts to the real (actual) world of things. Contrary to this opinion I will try to show that Descartes famo...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2012]
|
In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2012, Volume: 4, Issue: 2, Pages: 187-195 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1567181163 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20180115170038.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180115s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.24204/ejpr.v4i2.304 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1567181163 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)497181169 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ497181169 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Judycki, Stanislaw |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Descartes' Ontological Proof |b An Interpretation and Defense |c Stanislaw Judycki |
264 | 1 | |c [2012] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a It is widely assumed among contemporary philosophers that Descartes version of ontological proof, among other weaknesses, makes an impossible and unjustified move from the mental world of concepts to the real (actual) world of things. Contrary to this opinion I will try to show that Descartes famous principle of clear and distinct perception suffices to find an adequate inferential connection between the contents of the human mind and extra-mental reality. In a clear and distinct way we cognitively grasp the concept of supremely perfect being as the concept that we do not construct by an arbitrary definition of the word God. | ||
601 | |a Ontologie | ||
601 | |a Interpretation | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal for philosophy of religion |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009 |g 4(2012), 2, Seite 187-195 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)718600770 |w (DE-600)2659606-4 |w (DE-576)477533728 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:4 |g year:2012 |g number:2 |g pages:187-195 |
856 | |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/download/304/279 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/304 |x Verlag |z teilw. kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v4i2.304 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 2992874841 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1567181163 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20180115170038 | ||
LOK | |0 008 180115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |