Safety and Knowledge in God

In recent ‘secular’ Epistemology, much attention has been paid to formulating an ‘anti-luck’ or ‘safety’ condition; it is now widely held that such a condition is an essential part of any satisfactory post-Gettier reflection on the nature of knowledge. In this paper, I explain the safety condition a...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mawson, T. J. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham [2014]
In: European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2014, Volume: 6, Issue: 2, Pages: 81-100
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Knowability of God / Epistemologische Überzeugung
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
NBC Doctrine of God
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 156718149X
003 DE-627
005 20180516114841.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180115s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.24204/ejpr.v6i2.179  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)156718149X 
035 |a (DE-576)497181495 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ497181495 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Mawson, T. J.  |4 aut 
109 |a Mawson, T. J. 
245 1 0 |a Safety and Knowledge in God  |c T. J. Mawson 
264 1 |c [2014] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In recent ‘secular’ Epistemology, much attention has been paid to formulating an ‘anti-luck’ or ‘safety’ condition; it is now widely held that such a condition is an essential part of any satisfactory post-Gettier reflection on the nature of knowledge. In this paper, I explain the safety condition as it has emerged and then explore some implications of and for it arising from considering the God issue. It looks at the outset as if safety might be ‘good news’ for a view characteristic of Reformed Epistemology, viz. the view that if Theism is true, many philosophically unsophisticated believers probably know that it’s true. A (tentatively-drawn) sub-conclusion of my paper though suggests that as safety does not by itself turn true belief into knowledge, the recent focus on it is not quite such good news for Reformed Epistemologists as they may have hoped: it’s not that safety provides a new route by which they can reach this sort of conclusion. But safety is still good news for their view at least in the sense that there is no reason arising from considering it to count these philosophically unsophisticated believers as not knowing that there’s a God. I conclude by reflecting that good news for Reformed Epistemology is perhaps bad news for the discipline of Philosophy of Religion more generally, as there’s a possible ‘reflection destroys knowledge’-implication to be drawn. Those who have been led to their religious beliefs in at least some philosophically unsophisticated ways seem to enjoy much safer religious beliefs than those who have been led to their religious beliefs by philosophical reflection, so the discipline as a whole will be adversely affected if safety is eventually accorded the role of a necessary condition for knowledge. 
601 |a Knowledge 
652 |a AB:NBC 
689 0 0 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4113774-7  |0 (DE-627)105826952  |0 (DE-576)209479221  |2 gnd  |a Gotteserkenntnis 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)1113033665  |0 (DE-627)867046236  |0 (DE-576)476836476  |2 gnd  |a Epistemologische Überzeugung 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t European journal for philosophy of religion  |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009  |g 6(2014), 2, Seite 81-100  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)718600770  |w (DE-600)2659606-4  |w (DE-576)477533728  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:6  |g year:2014  |g number:2  |g pages:81-100 
856 |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/download/179/139  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] 
856 4 0 |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/179  |x Verlag  |z teilw. kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v6i2.179  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2992875155 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 156718149X 
LOK |0 005 20180509182332 
LOK |0 008 180115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051507  |a NBC 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Knowability of God,God 
STB 0 0 |a Connaissance de Dieu,Cogniscibilité de Dieu,Cogniscibilité de Dieu 
STC 0 0 |a Conocimiento de Dios 
STD 0 0 |a Conoscibilità di Dio 
STE 0 0 |a 认识神,对神的认识 
STF 0 0 |a 認識神,對神的認識 
STG 0 0 |a Conhecimento de Deus 
STH 0 0 |a Познание Бога 
STI 0 0 |a Γνώση του Θεού 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Erkennbarkeit Gottes , Epistemische Überzeugung