Against Theological Fictionalism
According to theological fictionalism, God has the same status as a fictional character in a novel or a movie. Such a claim has been defended by Robin le Poidevin on the basis of Kendall Waltons theory of make-believe. But it is not only a philosophical esoteric account of religious beliefs, it is...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2011]
|
In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2011, Volume: 3, Issue: 2, Pages: 427-437 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1567182054 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20180115170123.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180115s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.24204/ejpr.v3i2.404 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1567182054 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)49718205X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ49718205X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Pouivet, Roger |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Against Theological Fictionalism |c Roger Pouivet |
264 | 1 | |c [2011] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a According to theological fictionalism, God has the same status as a fictional character in a novel or a movie. Such a claim has been defended by Robin le Poidevin on the basis of Kendall Waltons theory of make-believe. But it is not only a philosophical esoteric account of religious beliefs, it is now an exoteric view, sometimes accepted by believers themselves, and so could even be considered a postmodern heresy. But theological fictionalism does not work: faith is real assent and not make-believe; belief is different from acceptance; belief and faith are dispositional, but make-believe seems to presuppose an account of beliefs as occurrent states; we cannot anymore imagine at will than we can believe at will. | ||
601 | |a Theologe | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal for philosophy of religion |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009 |g 3(2011), 2, Seite 427-437 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)718600770 |w (DE-600)2659606-4 |w (DE-576)477533728 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:3 |g year:2011 |g number:2 |g pages:427-437 |
776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)163692932X |k Non-Electronic | ||
856 | |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/download/404/375 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/404 |x Verlag |z teilw. kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v3i2.404 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 299287566X | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1567182054 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20180115170123 | ||
LOK | |0 008 180115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |