The Theistic Argument from Beauty
In this paper I consider an understudied form of the design argument which focuses on the beauty of the natural world and which argues, on that basis, that the world requires a divine Artist in order to explain its beauty. Against this view, one might raise a question concerning the beauty of, and i...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2013]
|
| In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2013, Volume: 5, Issue: 3, Pages: 149-158 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1567182178 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20180115170128.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180115s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.24204/ejpr.v5i3.224 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1567182178 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)497182173 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ497182173 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Ribeiro, Brian |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Theistic Argument from Beauty |c Brian Ribeiro |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2013] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this paper I consider an understudied form of the design argument which focuses on the beauty of the natural world and which argues, on that basis, that the world requires a divine Artist in order to explain its beauty. Against this view, one might raise a question concerning the beauty of, and in, this divine Artist. What explains the divine beauty? This kind of explanatory regress objection is exactly like that used by Philo in Humes Dialogues to undercut standard versions of the design argument focused on the orderliness of the world. Here I argue that Philos explanatory regress objection likewise significantly undercuts versions of the design argument focusing on the beauty of the world. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal for philosophy of religion |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009 |g 5(2013), 3, Seite 149-158 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)718600770 |w (DE-600)2659606-4 |w (DE-576)477533728 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:5 |g year:2013 |g number:3 |g pages:149-158 |
| 856 | |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/download/224/192 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/224 |x Verlag |z teilw. kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v5i3.224 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2992875783 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1567182178 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180115170128 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 180115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||