On Pain and the Privation Theory of Evil
The paper argues that pain is not a good counter-example to the privation theory of evil. Objectors to the privation thesis see pain as too real to be accounted for in privative terms. However, the properties for which pain is intuitively thought of as real, i.e. its localised nature, intensity, and...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2012]
|
| In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2012, Volume: 4, Issue: 1, Pages: 19-34 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1567182313 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20180115170136.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180115s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.24204/ejpr.v4i1.306 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1567182313 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)497182319 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ497182319 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Samet, Irit |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a On Pain and the Privation Theory of Evil |c Irit Samet |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2012] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The paper argues that pain is not a good counter-example to the privation theory of evil. Objectors to the privation thesis see pain as too real to be accounted for in privative terms. However, the properties for which pain is intuitively thought of as real, i.e. its localised nature, intensity, and quality (prickly, throbbing, etc.) are features of the senso-somatic aspect of pain. This is a problem for the objectors because, as findings of modern science clearly demonstrate, the senso-somatic aspect of pain is neurologically and clinically separate from the emotional-psychological aspect of suffering. The intuition that what seems so real in pain is also the source of pains negative value thus falls apart. As far as the affective aspect of pain, i.e. painfulness is concerned, it cannot refute the privation thesis either. For even if this is indeed the source of pains badness, the affective aspect is best accounted for in privative terms of loss and negation. The same holds for the effect of pain on the aching person. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal for philosophy of religion |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009 |g 4(2012), 1, Seite 19-34 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)718600770 |w (DE-600)2659606-4 |w (DE-576)477533728 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:4 |g year:2012 |g number:1 |g pages:19-34 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1636944191 |k Non-Electronic | ||
| 856 | |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/download/306/281 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/306 |x Verlag |z teilw. kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v4i1.306 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2992875929 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1567182313 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180115170136 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 180115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||