Divine Action and God's Immutability
Todays debates present occasionalism as the position that any satisfying account of divine action must avoid. In this paper I discuss how a leading Cartesian author of the end of the seventeenth century, Pierre-Sylvain Régis, attempted to avoid occasionalism. Régiss case is illuminating because...
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal for philosophy of religion |
|---|---|
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2015]
|
| In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
|
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Regis, Pierre-Sylvain 1632-1707
/ Gott
/ Handlung
/ Wunder
/ Unveränderlichkeit Gottes
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus NBC Gotteslehre |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
| Zusammenfassung: | Todays debates present occasionalism as the position that any satisfying account of divine action must avoid. In this paper I discuss how a leading Cartesian author of the end of the seventeenth century, Pierre-Sylvain Régis, attempted to avoid occasionalism. Régiss case is illuminating because it stresses both the difficulties connected with the traditional alternatives to occasionalism (so-called concurrentism and mere-conservationism) and also those aspects embedded in the occasionalist position that should be taken into due account. The paper focuses on Régiss own account of secondary causation in order to show how the challenge of avoiding occasionalism can lead to the development of new accounts of divine action. |
|---|---|
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v7i4.90 |