Divine Action and God's Immutability
Todays debates present occasionalism as the position that any satisfying account of divine action must avoid. In this paper I discuss how a leading Cartesian author of the end of the seventeenth century, Pierre-Sylvain Régis, attempted to avoid occasionalism. Régiss case is illuminating because...
| Publié dans: | European journal for philosophy of religion |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2015]
|
| Dans: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Regis, Pierre-Sylvain 1632-1707
/ Dieu
/ Action
/ Miracle
/ Immutabilité de Dieu
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion NBC Dieu |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | Todays debates present occasionalism as the position that any satisfying account of divine action must avoid. In this paper I discuss how a leading Cartesian author of the end of the seventeenth century, Pierre-Sylvain Régis, attempted to avoid occasionalism. Régiss case is illuminating because it stresses both the difficulties connected with the traditional alternatives to occasionalism (so-called concurrentism and mere-conservationism) and also those aspects embedded in the occasionalist position that should be taken into due account. The paper focuses on Régiss own account of secondary causation in order to show how the challenge of avoiding occasionalism can lead to the development of new accounts of divine action. |
|---|---|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v7i4.90 |