Common Core/Diversity Dilemma, Agatheism and the Epistemology of Religious Belief

The essay “The Common-Core/Diversity Dilemma: Revisions of Humean Thought, New Empirical Research, and the Limits of Rational Religious Belief” is a bold argument for the irrationality of “first-order” religious belief (that is, the belief that adherents to particular religions have). However, unlik...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Senor, Thomas D. 1960- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham [2016]
In: European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2016, Volume: 8, Issue: 4, Pages: 213-226
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Religion / Equality / Diversity / Faith / Cognition theory / Theism / The Good
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1567182518
003 DE-627
005 20180614101547.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180115s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.24204/ejpr.v8i4.1764  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1567182518 
035 |a (DE-576)497182513 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ497182513 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |0 (DE-588)17307524X  |0 (DE-627)697999092  |0 (DE-576)133927520  |4 aut  |a Senor, Thomas D.  |d 1960- 
109 |a Senor, Thomas D. 1960-  |a Senor, Thomas David 1960- 
245 1 0 |a Common Core/Diversity Dilemma, Agatheism and the Epistemology of Religious Belief  |c Thomas D. Senor 
264 1 |c [2016] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The essay “The Common-Core/Diversity Dilemma: Revisions of Humean Thought, New Empirical Research, and the Limits of Rational Religious Belief” is a bold argument for the irrationality of “first-order” religious belief (that is, the belief that adherents to particular religions have). However, unlike those associated with “New Atheism,” the paper’s authors Branden Thornhill-Miller and Peter Millican claim both that there are prospects for rational “second-order” religious belief (a religion-neutral belief in a designer of some sort) and that religious belief and practice can play a positive role in human life. In response to Thornhill-Miller and Millican, Janusz Salamon has argued that first- order religious belief can be rational, although not via the methods that philosophers who have typically defended the reasonability of faith have appealed to. Both papers are fascinating discussions of the epistemology of religious belief in general, and of the rationality of such commitment in light of modern science and religious disagreement in particular. In this paper, I’ll object to a few points made in each essay and argue that neither paper provides good reason to be dubious about the religious belief being rational along traditional lines. 
601 |a Dilemma 
652 |a AB 
689 0 0 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4049396-9  |0 (DE-627)106187155  |0 (DE-576)209081880  |2 gnd  |a Religion 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4021231-2  |0 (DE-627)106314920  |0 (DE-576)208936866  |2 gnd  |a Gleichheit 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4312811-7  |0 (DE-627)124348807  |0 (DE-576)211148946  |2 gnd  |a Vielfalt 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4071867-0  |0 (DE-627)104707917  |0 (DE-576)209185139  |2 gnd  |a Glaube 
689 0 4 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4070914-0  |0 (DE-627)106099086  |0 (DE-576)209182261  |2 gnd  |a Erkenntnistheorie 
689 0 5 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4059729-5  |0 (DE-627)10614250X  |0 (DE-576)209131942  |2 gnd  |a Theismus 
689 0 6 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4022600-1  |0 (DE-627)106307991  |0 (DE-576)208944702  |2 gnd  |a Das Gute 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t European journal for philosophy of religion  |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009  |g 8(2016), 4, Seite 213-226  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)718600770  |w (DE-600)2659606-4  |w (DE-576)477533728  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:8  |g year:2016  |g number:4  |g pages:213-226 
856 |u https://philosophy-of-religion.eu/index.php/ejpr/article/download/1764/1449  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] 
856 4 0 |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/1764  |x Verlag  |z teilw. kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v8i4.1764  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 8  |j 2016  |e 4  |h 213-226 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 299287616X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1567182518 
LOK |0 005 20180604145554 
LOK |0 008 180115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Cognition theory,Epistemology,Theory of knowledge,Knowledge,Diversity,Variety,Equality,Political equality,Social equality,Legal equality,Equality before the law,Faith,Faith,Belief in God,Religion,Religion in literature,Religions,Religion,The Good,Good and evil,Theism 
STB 0 0 |a Diversité,Pluralité,Pluralité,Foi,Foi,Le bien,Bien (philosophie),Religion,Religions,Religion,Théisme,Théorie de la connaissance,Épistémologie,Égalité 
STC 0 0 |a Diversidad,Epistemología,Fe,Fe,Igualdad,Lo bien,Religión,Religión,Religión,Teísmo 
STD 0 0 |a Epistemologia,Teoria epistemiologica,Teoria epistemiologica,Fede,Fede,Il bene,Pluralità,Religione,Religione,Religione,Teismo,Uguaglianza 
STE 0 0 |a 信念,信念,信心,信德,信心,信德,多样性,多样化,宗教,宗教,平等,相等,同等,有神论,知识论,认识论,那 好的,那 美善的,那 善的 
STF 0 0 |a 信念,信念,信心,信德,信心,信德,多樣性,多樣化,宗教,宗教,平等,相等,同等,有神論,知識論,認識論,那 好的,那 美善的,那 善的 
STG 0 0 |a Diversidade,Epistemologia,Fé,Fé,Igualdade,O bem,Religião,Religião,Teísmo 
STH 0 0 |a Вера (мотив),Вера,Добро,Многообразие,Равность,Религия,Религия (мотив),Теизм,Теория познания 
STI 0 0 |a Γνωσιολογία,Γνωσιοθεωρία,Επιστημολογία,Θεϊσμός,Θρησκεία,Θρησκεία (μοτίβο),Ισότητα,Πίστη (μοτίβο),Πίστη,Ποικιλία,Ποικιλομορφία,Το Καλό 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Religion,Mystik,Mythologie , Egalité,Politische Gleichheit,Rechtsgleichheit,Soziale Gleichheit,Egalität , Diversität,Vielfältigkeit,Diversity , Glauben,Gottesglaube,Überzeugung , Epistemologie,Epistologie,Erkenntnisphilosophie,Gnoseologie,Epistemologie,Epistologie,Erkenntnislehre,Erkenntnisphilosophie,Gnoseologie , Gutes