Religious Pluralism and the Some-Are-Equally-Right View

In this essay I identify and develop an alternative to pluralism which is overlooked in contemporary debate in philosophy of religion and in theology. According to this view, some but not all of the great world religions are equally correct, that is to say, they are just as successful when it comes...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stenmark, Mikael (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham [2009]
In: European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2009, Volume: 1, Issue: 2, Pages: 21-35
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1567182623
003 DE-627
005 20180115170155.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180115s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.24204/ejpr.v1i2.339  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1567182623 
035 |a (DE-576)497182629 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ497182629 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Stenmark, Mikael  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Religious Pluralism and the Some-Are-Equally-Right View  |c Mikael Stenmark 
264 1 |c [2009] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this essay I identify and develop an alternative to pluralism which is overlooked in contemporary debate in philosophy of religion and in theology. According to this view, some but not all of the great world religions are equally correct, that is to say, they are just as successful when it comes to tracking the truth and providing a path to salvation. This alternative is not haunted by the same difficulty as pluralism, namely the problem of emptiness. It is therefore more rational at least for many Muslims, but probably also for many Christians and Jews, to embrace it rather than to embrace pluralism. Whether it is also to be preferred over exclusivism and inclusivism is a topic which I will not address in this essay. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t European journal for philosophy of religion  |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009  |g 1(2009), 2, Seite 21-35  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)718600770  |w (DE-600)2659606-4  |w (DE-576)477533728  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:1  |g year:2009  |g number:2  |g pages:21-35 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1636885616  |k Non-Electronic 
856 |u https://philosophy-of-religion.eu/index.php/ejpr/article/download/339/313  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] 
856 4 0 |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/339  |x Verlag  |z teilw. kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v1i2.339  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2992876275 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1567182623 
LOK |0 005 20180115170155 
LOK |0 008 180115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL