Religious Pluralism and the Some-Are-Equally-Right View
In this essay I identify and develop an alternative to pluralism which is overlooked in contemporary debate in philosophy of religion and in theology. According to this view, some but not all of the great world religions are equally correct, that is to say, they are just as successful when it comes...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2009]
|
In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2009, Volume: 1, Issue: 2, Pages: 21-35 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1567182623 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20180115170155.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180115s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.24204/ejpr.v1i2.339 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1567182623 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)497182629 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ497182629 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Stenmark, Mikael |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Religious Pluralism and the Some-Are-Equally-Right View |c Mikael Stenmark |
264 | 1 | |c [2009] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a In this essay I identify and develop an alternative to pluralism which is overlooked in contemporary debate in philosophy of religion and in theology. According to this view, some but not all of the great world religions are equally correct, that is to say, they are just as successful when it comes to tracking the truth and providing a path to salvation. This alternative is not haunted by the same difficulty as pluralism, namely the problem of emptiness. It is therefore more rational at least for many Muslims, but probably also for many Christians and Jews, to embrace it rather than to embrace pluralism. Whether it is also to be preferred over exclusivism and inclusivism is a topic which I will not address in this essay. | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal for philosophy of religion |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009 |g 1(2009), 2, Seite 21-35 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)718600770 |w (DE-600)2659606-4 |w (DE-576)477533728 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:1 |g year:2009 |g number:2 |g pages:21-35 |
776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1636885616 |k Non-Electronic | ||
856 | |u https://philosophy-of-religion.eu/index.php/ejpr/article/download/339/313 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/339 |x Verlag |z teilw. kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v1i2.339 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 2992876275 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1567182623 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20180115170155 | ||
LOK | |0 008 180115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |