Assessing Ontological Arguments
Part I argues that ontological arguments, like other classical proofs of the existence of God, are parts of larger arguments in which they are embedded. These larger arguments include reasons supporting the proofs premises and responses to them, and to the proofs claims to validity and non-circula...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2012]
|
| In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2012, Volume: 4, Issue: 2, Pages: 19-39 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1567182992 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20180115170217.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180115s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.24204/ejpr.v4i2.294 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1567182992 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)497182998 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ497182998 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Wainwright, William J. |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Assessing Ontological Arguments |c William J. Wainwright |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2012] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Part I argues that ontological arguments, like other classical proofs of the existence of God, are parts of larger arguments in which they are embedded. These larger arguments include reasons supporting the proofs premises and responses to them, and to the proofs claims to validity and non-circularity, since, in the final analysis, our assessment of the proofs will express our best judgment of the cumulative force of all the considerations bearing on their overall adequacy. Part II illustrates these points by examining contemporary defences of, and attacks on, one of the ontological arguments central premises, namely, that Gods existence is logically possible. | ||
| 601 | |a Ontologie | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal for philosophy of religion |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009 |g 4(2012), 2, Seite 19-39 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)718600770 |w (DE-600)2659606-4 |w (DE-576)477533728 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:4 |g year:2012 |g number:2 |g pages:19-39 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1636950701 |k Non-Electronic | ||
| 856 | |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/download/294/269 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/294 |x Verlag |z teilw. kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v4i2.294 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2992876674 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1567182992 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180115170217 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 180115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||