The problem of invoking infinite polytheisms: a response to Raphael Lataster and Herman Philipse
Raphael Lataster and Herman Philipse present an argument which they think decisively demonstrates polytheism over monotheism, if theism is assumed. Far from being decisive, the argument depends on very controversial and likely false assumptions about how to treat infinities in probability. Moreover,...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
[2017]
|
In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2017, Volume: 82, Issue: 3, Pages: 289-298 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Lataster, Raphael
/ Philipse, Herman 1951-
/ Polytheism
/ Monotheism
|
Further subjects: | B
Theism
B PHILIPSE, Herman B Argument B Polytheism B Argument from infinitely many alternatives B Lataster, Raphael B Monotheism |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1567861458 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221110132825.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180130s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-016-9585-y |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1567861458 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)497861453 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ497861453 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)103653295X |0 (DE-627)750467681 |0 (DE-576)384755631 |4 aut |a Saward, Mark Douglas | |
109 | |a Saward, Mark Douglas |a Saward, Mark | ||
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The problem of invoking infinite polytheisms |b a response to Raphael Lataster and Herman Philipse |c Mark Saward |
264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Raphael Lataster and Herman Philipse present an argument which they think decisively demonstrates polytheism over monotheism, if theism is assumed. Far from being decisive, the argument depends on very controversial and likely false assumptions about how to treat infinities in probability. Moreover, these problems are well known. Here, we focus on three objections. First, the authors rely on both countable additivity and the Principle of Indifference, which contradict each other. Second, the authors rely on a particular way of dividing up the possibility space, when there are equally as reasonable alternative divisions which give different answers to the one the authors arrived at. Third, the authors' argument proves too much, giving us an argument against many positions we should not be able to argue against so easily. | ||
601 | |a Problem | ||
650 | 4 | |a Argument | |
650 | 4 | |a Argument from infinitely many alternatives | |
650 | 4 | |a Lataster, Raphael | |
650 | 4 | |a Monotheism | |
650 | 4 | |a Monotheism | |
650 | 4 | |a PHILIPSE, Herman | |
650 | 4 | |a Polytheism | |
650 | 4 | |a Polytheism | |
650 | 4 | |a Theism | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |d p |0 (DE-588)1174830034 |0 (DE-627)1045718122 |0 (DE-576)515956864 |2 gnd |a Lataster, Raphael |
689 | 0 | 1 | |d p |0 (DE-588)172765145 |0 (DE-627)69769626X |0 (DE-576)133622010 |2 gnd |a Philipse, Herman |d 1951- |
689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4175322-7 |0 (DE-627)105365238 |0 (DE-576)209962747 |2 gnd |a Polytheismus |
689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4040107-8 |0 (DE-627)106225359 |0 (DE-576)209038063 |2 gnd |a Monotheismus |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 82(2017), 3, Seite 289-298 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:82 |g year:2017 |g number:3 |g pages:289-298 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-016-9585-y |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 2994618907 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1567861458 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20180130142152 | ||
LOK | |0 008 180130||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Argument,Monotheism,Monotheistic religion,Polytheism |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Argument,Monothéisme,Polythéisme |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Argumento,Monoteísmo,Politeísmo |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Argomento,Monoteismo,Politeismo |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 一神论,多神论 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 一神論,多神論,逻辑论证 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Argumento,Monoteísmo,Politeísmo |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Аргумент,Монотеизм,Политеизм |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Επιχείρημα,Μονοθεϊσμός,Πολυθεϊσμός |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Philipse, H.,1951- , Vielgötterei , Monotheistische Religion |