The problem of invoking infinite polytheisms: a response to Raphael Lataster and Herman Philipse

Raphael Lataster and Herman Philipse present an argument which they think decisively demonstrates polytheism over monotheism, if theism is assumed. Far from being decisive, the argument depends on very controversial and likely false assumptions about how to treat infinities in probability. Moreover,...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Saward, Mark Douglas (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Nature B. V [2017]
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2017, Volume: 82, Issue: 3, Pages: 289-298
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Lataster, Raphael / Philipse, Herman 1951- / Polytheism / Monotheism
Further subjects:B Theism
B PHILIPSE, Herman
B Argument
B Polytheism
B Argument from infinitely many alternatives
B Lataster, Raphael
B Monotheism
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1567861458
003 DE-627
005 20221110132825.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180130s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-016-9585-y  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1567861458 
035 |a (DE-576)497861453 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ497861453 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)103653295X  |0 (DE-627)750467681  |0 (DE-576)384755631  |4 aut  |a Saward, Mark Douglas 
109 |a Saward, Mark Douglas  |a Saward, Mark 
245 1 4 |a The problem of invoking infinite polytheisms  |b a response to Raphael Lataster and Herman Philipse  |c Mark Saward 
264 1 |c [2017] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Raphael Lataster and Herman Philipse present an argument which they think decisively demonstrates polytheism over monotheism, if theism is assumed. Far from being decisive, the argument depends on very controversial and likely false assumptions about how to treat infinities in probability. Moreover, these problems are well known. Here, we focus on three objections. First, the authors rely on both countable additivity and the Principle of Indifference, which contradict each other. Second, the authors rely on a particular way of dividing up the possibility space, when there are equally as reasonable alternative divisions which give different answers to the one the authors arrived at. Third, the authors' argument proves too much, giving us an argument against many positions we should not be able to argue against so easily. 
601 |a Problem 
650 4 |a Argument 
650 4 |a Argument from infinitely many alternatives 
650 4 |a Lataster, Raphael 
650 4 |a Monotheism 
650 4 |a Monotheism 
650 4 |a PHILIPSE, Herman 
650 4 |a Polytheism 
650 4 |a Polytheism 
650 4 |a Theism 
689 0 0 |d p  |0 (DE-588)1174830034  |0 (DE-627)1045718122  |0 (DE-576)515956864  |2 gnd  |a Lataster, Raphael 
689 0 1 |d p  |0 (DE-588)172765145  |0 (DE-627)69769626X  |0 (DE-576)133622010  |2 gnd  |a Philipse, Herman  |d 1951- 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4175322-7  |0 (DE-627)105365238  |0 (DE-576)209962747  |2 gnd  |a Polytheismus 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4040107-8  |0 (DE-627)106225359  |0 (DE-576)209038063  |2 gnd  |a Monotheismus 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970  |g 82(2017), 3, Seite 289-298  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:82  |g year:2017  |g number:3  |g pages:289-298 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-016-9585-y  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2994618907 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1567861458 
LOK |0 005 20180130142152 
LOK |0 008 180130||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Argument,Monotheism,Monotheistic religion,Polytheism 
STB 0 0 |a Argument,Monothéisme,Polythéisme 
STC 0 0 |a Argumento,Monoteísmo,Politeísmo 
STD 0 0 |a Argomento,Monoteismo,Politeismo 
STE 0 0 |a 一神论,多神论 
STF 0 0 |a 一神論,多神論,逻辑论证 
STG 0 0 |a Argumento,Monoteísmo,Politeísmo 
STH 0 0 |a Аргумент,Монотеизм,Политеизм 
STI 0 0 |a Επιχείρημα,Μονοθεϊσμός,Πολυθεϊσμός 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Philipse, H.,1951- , Vielgötterei , Monotheistische Religion