The threat of logical inversion and our need for philosophical attention: from thought-expression to discourse and discussion
Thought-expressions are not simply good; instead, they become good for us when they make sense, empower action, and support health. From time to time, we may need to (re)consider the difference between thought-expression and discourse, or thought-expression that really makes sense, and the differenc...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
[2018]
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2018, Volume: 83, Issue: 1, Pages: 21-39 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Reasoning
/ Argumentum e contrario
/ Discoursivity
|
| Further subjects: | B
philosophy of religion
B Logical inversion B D. Z. Phillips B William James B Self-deception B Discussion |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1567863671 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221110132826.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180130s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-016-9595-9 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1567863671 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)497863677 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ497863677 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Yarbrough, Brandon |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The threat of logical inversion and our need for philosophical attention |b from thought-expression to discourse and discussion |c Brandon Yarbrough |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2018] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Thought-expressions are not simply good; instead, they become good for us when they make sense, empower action, and support health. From time to time, we may need to (re)consider the difference between thought-expression and discourse, or thought-expression that really makes sense, and the difference between discourse and discussion, or a discourse-situation that makes genuine agreement or disagreement possible for us. In this essay, I explore a problem that D. Z. Phillips and Randy Ramal have termed 'logical inversion,' and I argue that wherever logical inversions have gained a foothold in our thought-expressions, they threaten to render us incapable of authentic discourse and discussion by ensuring that we misunderstand the understandings of others such that we deceive ourselves and others by picturing the knowledge and truth of our perspective against an unreal background of conceivable falsehoods which we have falsely attributed to the perspectives of others. Where this has taken place, practices of philosophical attention and conceptual clarification are needed to help us move from a situation of endless thought expression toward authentic discourse and discussion. | ||
| 601 | |a Philosophie | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a D. Z. Phillips | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Discussion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Logical inversion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a philosophy of religion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Self-deception | |
| 650 | 4 | |a William James | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4323319-3 |0 (DE-627)128275502 |0 (DE-576)211244171 |2 gnd |a Logisches Denken |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)7744778-5 |0 (DE-627)658890905 |0 (DE-576)343350866 |2 gnd |a Umkehrschluss |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4245399-9 |0 (DE-627)104828102 |0 (DE-576)210471107 |2 gnd |a Diskursivität |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 83(2018), 1, Seite 21-39 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:83 |g year:2018 |g number:1 |g pages:21-39 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-016-9595-9 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2994622084 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1567863671 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180130144306 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 180130||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Argumentum e contrario,Discoursivity,Reasoning |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a A contrario,Discursivité,Pensée logique |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Discursividad,Pensamiento lógico |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Discorsività,Pensiero logico |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a A contrario,Discursividade,Pensamento lógico |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Дискурсивность,Логическое мышление |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Διαλεκτικότητα,Λογική σκέψη |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Logik , Argumentum e contrario |