The threat of logical inversion and our need for philosophical attention: from thought-expression to discourse and discussion
Thought-expressions are not simply good; instead, they become good for us when they make sense, empower action, and support health. From time to time, we may need to (re)consider the difference between thought-expression and discourse, or thought-expression that really makes sense, and the differenc...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
[2018]
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2018, Volume: 83, Issue: 1, Pages: 21-39 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Reasoning
/ Argumentum e contrario
/ Discoursivity
|
| Further subjects: | B
philosophy of religion
B Logical inversion B D. Z. Phillips B William James B Self-deception B Discussion |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |