Censuring the Teutonic Philosopher?

This essay examines Henry More’s engagement with Jacob Böhme and compares the sympathetic critique of Böhme with More’s much more negative evaluation of Spinoza. More directs his criticism of Böhme at the similarities between Spinoza and Böhme: their materialism and confusion of God and world. The p...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hedley, Douglas 1961- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2018
In: Aries
Year: 2018, Volume: 18, Issue: 1, Pages: 54-74
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Böhme, Jakob 1575-1624 / Reception / More, Henry 1614-1687 / Platonism / Spinoza, Benedictus de 1632-1677 / Determinism
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
AZ New religious movements
KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history
TJ Modern history
Further subjects:B Henry More Jacob Böhme Cambridge Platonists Spinoza metaphysics Platonic theology
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 156810619X
003 DE-627
005 20200618164730.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180206s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/15700593-01801004  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)156810619X 
035 |a (DE-576)498106195 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ498106195 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |0 (DE-588)120587521  |0 (DE-627)080763367  |0 (DE-576)179904078  |4 aut  |a Hedley, Douglas  |d 1961- 
109 |a Hedley, Douglas 1961-  |a Hedley, Robert Douglas 1961- 
245 1 0 |a Censuring the Teutonic Philosopher? 
264 1 |c 2018 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This essay examines Henry More’s engagement with Jacob Böhme and compares the sympathetic critique of Böhme with More’s much more negative evaluation of Spinoza. More directs his criticism of Böhme at the similarities between Spinoza and Böhme: their materialism and confusion of God and world. The present essay suggests, however, that the perception of shared Platonism informs More’s more favourable approach to the Silesian. The problem of what “Platonism” means in this context is thus also addressed. Böhme’s writings were valued by More because of a shared metaphysics that rejected both radical dualism and pantheism, and the Platonic theology of the goodness of God and the freedom of man, together with the rejection of predestination. Spinoza, on the other hand, is rejected because of his radical determinism, his denial of any substantial distinction between good and evil, and the transcendent being of the divine. 
601 |a Philosophie 
650 4 |a Henry More  |x Jacob Böhme  |x Cambridge Platonists  |x Spinoza  |x metaphysics  |x Platonic theology 
652 |a AB:AZ:KAH:TJ 
689 0 0 |d p  |0 (DE-588)118512579  |0 (DE-627)135631068  |0 (DE-576)208870415  |2 gnd  |a Böhme, Jakob  |d 1575-1624 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4049716-1  |0 (DE-627)104675152  |0 (DE-576)209083182  |2 gnd  |a Rezeption 
689 0 2 |d p  |0 (DE-588)118736833  |0 (DE-627)134372042  |0 (DE-576)209376783  |2 gnd  |a More, Henry  |d 1614-1687 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4046303-5  |0 (DE-627)106198513  |0 (DE-576)209068914  |2 gnd  |a Platonismus 
689 0 4 |d p  |0 (DE-588)118616242  |0 (DE-627)133776166  |0 (DE-576)209117206  |2 gnd  |a Spinoza, Benedictus de  |d 1632-1677 
689 0 5 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4149218-3  |0 (DE-627)105562920  |0 (DE-576)209770805  |2 gnd  |a Determinismus 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Aries  |d Leiden : Brill, 2001  |g 18(2018), 1, Seite 54-74  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)349880581  |w (DE-600)2082129-3  |w (DE-576)10940324X  |x 1570-0593  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:18  |g year:2018  |g number:1  |g pages:54-74 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15700593-01801004  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2995328562 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 156810619X 
LOK |0 005 20200618164730 
LOK |0 008 180206||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a bril 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043326  |a AZ 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053909  |a TJ 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044624  |a KAH 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Determinism,Platonism,Reception,Reception,Impact,Afterlife 
STB 0 0 |a Déterminisme,Platonisme,Réception <scientifique>,Réception <scientifique>,Influence intellectuelle,Influence intellectuelle,Influence intellectuelle (motif),Influence intellectuelle 
STC 0 0 |a Determinismo,Platonismo,Recepción,Recepción 
STD 0 0 |a Determinismo,Platonismo,Ricezione,Ricezione 
STE 0 0 |a 决定论,接受,接收,柏拉图主义 
STF 0 0 |a 接受,接收,柏拉圖主義,決定論 
STG 0 0 |a Determinismo,Platonismo,Recepção,Recepção 
STH 0 0 |a Восприятие (мотив),Восприятие,Детерминизм,Платонизм 
STI 0 0 |a Αιτιοκρατία,Ντετερμινισμός,Αποδοχή (μοτίβο),Αποδοχή,Πλατωνισμός 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a B'ome, Jakob,1575-1624,Beme, Jakob,1575-1624,Bëme, Jakob,1575-1624,Philadelphus, Desiderius,1575-1624,Teutonicus Philosophus,1575-1624,Teutonicus,Philosophus,1575-1624,Teutonicus,Philosophicus,1575-1624,Böhmen, Jacob,1575-1624,Böhm, Jacob,1575-1624,Behme, Jacobus,1575-1624,Bohmius, Jacobus,1575-1624,Bohemus, Jacobus,1575-1624,Bohemius, Jacobus,1575-1624,Bohmius, Iacobus,1575-1624,Böhme, Jacobus,1575-1624,J. B. T.,1575-1624,Böehme, Jakob,1575-1624,Bohme, Jacob,1575-1624,Desiderius,Philadelphus,1575-1624,Boehme, Jakob,1575-1624,Boehme, Jacob,1575-1624,Böhme, Giacomo,1575-1624,Behmen, Jacob,1575-1624,Beem, Jacob,1575-1624,Beme, Jacob,1575-1624,Boemus, Jacobus,1575-1624,Behme, Jacob,1575-1624,Behm, Jacob,1575-1624,Böhme, Jacob,1575-1624,Behman, Jacob,1575-1624,Teutonicus,1575-1624,Beme, Jacobus,1575-1624,Böhmen, Jakob,1575-1624,Böhm, J.,1575-1624,Behmen, Iacob,1575-1624,Bohmen, Jacob,1575-1624,Bêhme, Jacob,1575-1624 , Fortwirken,Nachwirkung,Nachleben,Wirkungsgeschichte,Aneignung , Parresiastes, Philophilus,1614-1687,H. M.,1614-1687,Morus, Henricus,1614-1687,Palaeopolitanus, Franciscus,1614-1687,Parrhesiastes, Phililcrines,1614-1687,F. P.,1614-1687,Franciscus Palaeopolitanus,1614-1687,P., F.,1614-1687 , Spinoza, Benedictus,1632-1677,Spinoza, Benedictus Baruch de,1632-1677,Spinoza, Benedict,1632-1677,Spinoza, Benedict von,1632-1677,Spinoza, Benedict de,1632-1677,Spinoza, B. de,1632-1677,Spinoza, B.,1632-1677,Spinoza, Benedikt,1632-1677,Spinoza, Benedikt de,1632-1677,Spinoza, Benedikt von,1632-1677,Spinoza, Benediktus von,1632-1677,Spinoza, Benodicirct de,1632-1677,Spinoza, Baruch Benedictus de,1632-1677,Spinoza, Baruch Benedictus von,1632-1677,Spinoza, Baruch von,1632-1677,Spinoza, Baruch,1632-1677,Spînôzā, Bārûḵ,1632-1677,Spînôzā, Bārûḵ Ben-Miḵaʾel,1632-1677,Spinoza, Baruj,1632-1677,Spinoza, Benoît de,1632-1677,Spinoza, Ben-Michael,1632-1677,Spinoza, Bento de,1632-1677,Spinoza,1632-1677,Spinosa, Bénédict,1632-1677,Spinosa, Bénédict de,1632-1677,Spinosa, Benedictus de,1632-1677,Spinosa, Benedikt von,1632-1677,Spinosa, Benedikt,1632-1677,Spinosa, Benoit de,1632-1677,Spinosa, Benoît,1632-1677,Shpinozah, Barukh,1632-1677,Shpinozah, Barukh ben Mikhaʾel,1632-1677,S., B. d.,1632-1677,D'Espinoza, Baruh,1632-1677,Despinoza, Benedictus,1632-1677,Despinoza Benedictus,1632-1677,Espinosa, Baruch de,1632-1677,Espinosa, Bento de,1632-1677,Espinoza, Baruch de,1632-1677,Espinoza, Baruh d',1632-1677,Ispīnūzā, Bārūh,1632-1677,B. D. S.,1632-1677,B.D.S.,1632-1677,Baruch von Spinoza,1632-1677,Benedikt von Spinoza,1632-1677,Antistius Constans, Lucius,1632-1677,Constans, Lucius Antistius,1632-1677,Constans, Lucius A.,1632-1677,Sibinnuosuo,1632-1677,Spinoza, Baruch de,1632-1677,de Spinoza, Baruch,1632-1677