What Pessimism about Moral Deference Means for Disagreement
Many writers have recently argued that there is something distinctively problematic about sustaining moral beliefs on the basis of others' moral views. Call this claim pessimism about moral deference. Pessimism about moral deference, if true, seems to provide an attractive way to argue for a bo...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2018]
|
In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2018, Volume: 21, Issue: 1, Pages: 121-136 |
RelBib Classification: | NCA Ethics VA Philosophy |
Further subjects: | B
Moral deference
B Testimony B Epistemology of disagreement B Moral Disagreement |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1568627246 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20180208112702.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180208s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10677-017-9860-8 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1568627246 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)498627241 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ498627241 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Fritz, James |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a What Pessimism about Moral Deference Means for Disagreement |c James Fritz |
264 | 1 | |c [2018] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Many writers have recently argued that there is something distinctively problematic about sustaining moral beliefs on the basis of others' moral views. Call this claim pessimism about moral deference. Pessimism about moral deference, if true, seems to provide an attractive way to argue for a bold conclusion about moral disagreement: moral disagreement generally does not require belief revision. Call this claim steadfastness about moral disagreement. Perhaps the most prominent recent discussion of the connection between moral deference and moral disagreement, due to Alison Hills, uses pessimism about the former to argue for steadfastness about the latter. This paper reveals that this line of thinking, and others like it, are unsuccessful. There is no way to argue from a compelling version of pessimism about moral deference to the conclusion of steadfastness about moral disagreement. The most plausible versions of pessimism about moral deference have only very limited implications for moral disagreement. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Epistemology of disagreement | |
650 | 4 | |a Moral deference | |
650 | 4 | |a Moral Disagreement | |
650 | 4 | |a Testimony | |
652 | |a NCA:VA | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical theory and moral practice |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998 |g 21(2018), 1, Seite 121-136 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320527093 |w (DE-600)2015306-5 |w (DE-576)104558555 |x 1572-8447 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:21 |g year:2018 |g number:1 |g pages:121-136 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10677-017-9860-8 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-017-9860-8 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 2996594258 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1568627246 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20191105120434 | ||
LOK | |0 008 180208||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052465 |a NCA | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |