Approaches to philosophy of religion: contemplating the world or trying to find our way home?
What is the point of philosophy of religion? Is it to help us find the right path in life, with the philosopher as guide and mentor? Or is it, as D. Z. Phillips proposes, to contemplate the world in all its variety', deepening our understanding of multiple perspectives (both religious and non-...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2015]
|
In: |
Religious studies
Year: 2015, Volume: 51, Issue: 2, Pages: 221-239 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Religious philosophy
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1569752532 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20190228231509.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180212s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412514000377 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1569752532 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)499752538 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ499752538 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)130630225 |0 (DE-627)504910205 |0 (DE-576)184247454 |4 aut |a Burley, Mikel |d 1972- | |
109 | |a Burley, Mikel 1972- | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Approaches to philosophy of religion |b contemplating the world or trying to find our way home? |c Mikel Burley |
264 | 1 | |c [2015] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a What is the point of philosophy of religion? Is it to help us find the right path in life, with the philosopher as guide and mentor? Or is it, as D. Z. Phillips proposes, to contemplate the world in all its variety', deepening our understanding of multiple perspectives (both religious and non-religious) without trying to appropriate or reject any of them? Recognizing certain shortcomings of the former conception, this article seeks to elucidate the latter and to engage with the critical reception of Phillips's work by other Wittgenstein-influenced philosophers. Towards the end, with reference to Rush Rhees and Wittgenstein, I discuss how giving expression to wonder at what is terrible' illustrates the ethical demand of a contemplative approach, and in conclusion I offer some thoughts on how this approach could usefully be enriched and extended. | ||
601 | |a Philosophie | ||
601 | |a Religion | ||
652 | |a AB | ||
689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4049415-9 |0 (DE-627)104598581 |0 (DE-576)209081953 |2 gnd |a Religionsphilosophie |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 51(2015), 2, Seite 221-239 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:51 |g year:2015 |g number:2 |g pages:221-239 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/9F90FBA18546AF296658FEBC492087CC |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412514000377 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 2998745342 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1569752532 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20190301181108 | ||
LOK | |0 008 180212||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Religious philosophy,Philosophy of religion,Religion |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Philosophie des religions |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Filosofía de religión |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Filosofia della religione |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教哲学 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教哲學 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Filosofia da religião |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Философия религии |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Φιλοσοφία της θρησκείας |
SUB | |a REL |