The modality of theism and probabilistic natural theology: a tension in Alvin Plantinga's philosophy
In Wunder (2013) I observed a probabilistic blunder in Plantinga (2011) and argued that correcting it, while noting Plantinga's acceptance of logically non-contingent theism, had negative consequences for many other of his probabilistic claims. Professor Plantinga kindly replied to my correspon...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2015]
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Year: 2015, Volume: 51, Issue: 3, Pages: 391-399 |
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1569754780 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20200519162046.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180212s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412515000293 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1569754780 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)499754786 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ499754786 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1052821391 |0 (DE-627)789079550 |0 (DE-576)408553960 |4 aut |a Wunder, Tyler Andrew | |
| 109 | |a Wunder, Tyler Andrew | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The modality of theism and probabilistic natural theology |b a tension in Alvin Plantinga's philosophy |c Tyler Wunder |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2015] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In Wunder (2013) I observed a probabilistic blunder in Plantinga (2011) and argued that correcting it, while noting Plantinga's acceptance of logically non-contingent theism, had negative consequences for many other of his probabilistic claims. Professor Plantinga kindly replied to my correspondence, but the fruits of that conversation could not be incorporated into Wunder (2013). This article will explain the blunder and summarize my earlier arguments before addressing Plantinga's main replies. I conclude that these replies fail to circumvent most of the problems observed earlier: perhaps most significantly, the Evolutionary Argument against Naturalism and theism's logical non-contingency still appear jointly to imply theism's necessary falsehood. | ||
| 601 | |a Theologe | ||
| 601 | |a Plantinga, Alvin | ||
| 601 | |a Philosophie | ||
| 652 | |a AB | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 51(2015), 3, Seite 391-399 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:51 |g year:2015 |g number:3 |g pages:391-399 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik in |a Hendricks, Perry |t Response to Wunder |d 2020 |w (DE-627)1698575378 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/2D43B865D0A991F7A35E0820261F7DEB |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412515000293 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2998765610 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1569754780 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20190301181535 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 180212||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||