The greatest possible being needn't be anything impossible
There are various argumentative strategies for advancing the claim that God does not exist. One such strategy is this. First, one notes that God is meant to have a certain divine attribute (such as omniscience). One then argues that having the relevant attribute is impossible. One concludes that God...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2015]
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Year: 2015, Volume: 51, Issue: 4, Pages: 531-542 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Existence of God
/ Argumantation
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1569759715 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20190228231505.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180212s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412514000468 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1569759715 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)499759710 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ499759710 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1152240862 |0 (DE-627)1013728149 |0 (DE-576)421040912 |4 aut |a Todd, Patrick |d 1983- | |
| 109 | |a Todd, Patrick 1983- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The greatest possible being needn't be anything impossible |c Patrick Todd |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2015] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a There are various argumentative strategies for advancing the claim that God does not exist. One such strategy is this. First, one notes that God is meant to have a certain divine attribute (such as omniscience). One then argues that having the relevant attribute is impossible. One concludes that God doesn't exist. For instance, Dennis Whitcomb's recent paper, Grounding and omniscience', proceeds in exactly this way. As Whitcomb says, I'm going to argue that omniscience is impossible and that therefore there is no God.' This is not, I hope to show, a very promising way to start a paper. If having a given property is impossible, the greatest possible being need not have that property. Accordingly, the argumentative strategy in question is doomed to failure. The upshot of this article is a quite general one concerning how arguments against the existence of God in fact must proceed. | ||
| 652 | |a AB:NBC | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4131943-6 |0 (DE-627)10415165X |0 (DE-576)209631457 |2 gnd |a Gottesfrage |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4002899-9 |0 (DE-627)106391631 |0 (DE-576)208849173 |2 gnd |a Argumentation |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 51(2015), 4, Seite 531-542 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:51 |g year:2015 |g number:4 |g pages:531-542 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/3CDC5CD718421FB44ED99F78661847E5 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412514000468 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2998795579 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1569759715 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20190228111432 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 180212||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Argumantation,Reasoning,Existence of God,God,God question |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Argumentation,Raisonnement,Question de l’existence de Dieu |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Argumentación,Cuestión de la existencia de Dios |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Argomentazione,Questione dell'esistenza di Dio |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 神存在的提问,上帝的存在性,上帝存在的提问,论据 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 神存在的提問,上帝的存在性,上帝存在的提問,論據 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Argumentação,Questão da existência de Deus |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Аргументация,Вопрос о существовании Бога |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Επιχειρηματολογία,Ερώτημα της ύπαρξης του Θεού |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Existenz Gottes , Argumentieren |