Why not believe in an evil God? Pragmatic encroachment and some implications for philosophy of religion
Pointing to broad symmetries between the idea that God is omniscient, omnipotent, and all-good, and the idea that God is omniscient, omnipotent, but all-evil, the evil-God challenge raises the question of why theists should prefer one over the other. I respond to this challenge by drawing on a recen...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2016]
|
In: |
Religious studies
Year: 2016, Volume: 52, Issue: 3, Pages: 345-360 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Religious philosophy
/ God
/ Evil
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1569768781 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20190227231517.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180213s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412515000360 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1569768781 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)499768787 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ499768787 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1152275747 |0 (DE-627)1013755758 |0 (DE-576)499777468 |4 aut |a Scrutton, Anastasia Philippa | |
109 | |a Scrutton, Anastasia Philippa | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Why not believe in an evil God? Pragmatic encroachment and some implications for philosophy of religion |c Anastasia Philippa Scrutton |
264 | 1 | |c [2016] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Pointing to broad symmetries between the idea that God is omniscient, omnipotent, and all-good, and the idea that God is omniscient, omnipotent, but all-evil, the evil-God challenge raises the question of why theists should prefer one over the other. I respond to this challenge by drawing on a recent theory in epistemology, pragmatic encroachment, which asserts that practical considerations can alter the epistemic status of beliefs. I then explore some of the implications of my argument for how we do philosophy of religion, arguing that practical and contextual as well as alethic considerations are properly central to the discipline. | ||
601 | |a Pragmatik | ||
601 | |a Philosophie | ||
601 | |a Religion | ||
652 | |a AB | ||
689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4049415-9 |0 (DE-627)104598581 |0 (DE-576)209081953 |2 gnd |a Religionsphilosophie |
689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4021662-7 |0 (DE-627)104649747 |0 (DE-576)208939261 |2 gnd |a Gott |
689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4007524-2 |0 (DE-627)104162554 |0 (DE-576)208870830 |2 gnd |a Das Böse |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 52(2016), 3, Seite 345-360 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:52 |g year:2016 |g number:3 |g pages:345-360 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/9A5C4594412E5C2FBEA3ADFA69523500 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412515000360 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 2998839150 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1569768781 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20190228113203 | ||
LOK | |0 008 180213||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Evil,Evil,God,God,Religious philosophy,Philosophy of religion,Religion |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Dieu,Dieu,Le mal,Philosophie des religions |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Dios,Dios,El malo,Filosofía de religión |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Dio,Dio,Filosofia della religione,Il male |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教哲学,神,神,上帝,上帝,罪恶,恶,邪恶,罪恶,恶,邪恶 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教哲學,神,神,上帝,上帝,罪惡,惡,邪惡,罪惡,惡,邪惡 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Deus,Deus,Filosofia da religião,O mal |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Бог (мотив),Бог,Зло,Философия религии |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Θεός (μοτίβο),Θεός,Το Κακό,Φιλοσοφία της θρησκείας |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Playing God , Das Böse |