Another look at Hume's treatment of the argument from design in the Natural History of Religion
This article argues that Hume's seemingly peculiar treatment of the argument from design in his Natural History of Religion is not indicative of a radical, or even modest, shift in his overall epistemic evaluation of it. His focus is on the argument's impact on the psychology of religious...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2016]
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Year: 2016, Volume: 52, Issue: 4, Pages: 461-474 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Hume, David 1711-1776, Four dissertations
/ Natural religion
/ Teleology
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism VA Philosophy |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1569768854 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20190227231516.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180213s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412516000068 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1569768854 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)49976885X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ49976885X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1152281526 |0 (DE-627)1013761855 |0 (DE-576)499782038 |4 aut |a Kelahan, Emily | |
| 109 | |a Kelahan, Emily | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Another look at Hume's treatment of the argument from design in the Natural History of Religion |c Emily Kelahan |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2016] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article argues that Hume's seemingly peculiar treatment of the argument from design in his Natural History of Religion is not indicative of a radical, or even modest, shift in his overall epistemic evaluation of it. His focus is on the argument's impact on the psychology of religious believers, and not its rational acceptability. Hume never strays far from his stated intention for the work, to engage in a socio-psychological analysis of the nature of religious belief, including a thorough assessment of the role of the argument from design. Hume concludes that the argument is inconsequential to religious belief formation. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 601 | |a Religion | ||
| 601 | |a Historie | ||
| 652 | |a AB:VA | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d u |0 (DE-588)1090804490 |0 (DE-627)851409865 |0 (DE-576)461136279 |a Hume, David |2 gnd |d 1711-1776 |t Four dissertations |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4134549-6 |0 (DE-627)105671746 |0 (DE-576)209653248 |2 gnd |a Natürliche Religion |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4059367-8 |0 (DE-627)106143743 |0 (DE-576)209130504 |2 gnd |a Teleologie |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 52(2016), 4, Seite 461-474 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:52 |g year:2016 |g number:4 |g pages:461-474 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/66CC1DE4FDD8D867FF7907ACA9759F44 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412516000068 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2998839223 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1569768854 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20190301182511 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 180213||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Natural religion,Religion of reason,Reasonable religion,Teleology,Teleology |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Religion naturelle,Téléologie,Téléologie |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Religión natural,Teleología,Teleología |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Religione naturale,Teleologia,Teleologia |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 目的论,自然宗教 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 目的論,自然宗教 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Religião natural,Teleologia,Teleologia |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Естественная религия,Телеология (мотив),Телеология |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Τελεολογία (μοτίβο),Τελεολογία,Φυσική θρησκεία |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Vernunftreligion |