The X-claim argument against religious belief
This article outlines an argument against religious belief: the X-claim argument. The argument is novel at least in the sense that it has not yet been clearly articulated or addressed before in the philosophical literature. However, the argument is closely related to two more familiar varieties of a...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2018]
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Year: 2018, Volume: 54, Issue: 1, Pages: 15-35 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Religious conviction
/ Argumantation
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism AG Religious life; material religion CB Christian life; spirituality |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 156980480X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230925093228.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180213s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412516000330 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)156980480X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)499804805 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ499804805 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)123840325 |0 (DE-627)08547357X |0 (DE-576)185120512 |4 aut |a Law, Stephen |d 1960- | |
| 109 | |a Law, Stephen 1960- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The X-claim argument against religious belief |c Stephen Law |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2018] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article outlines an argument against religious belief: the X-claim argument. The argument is novel at least in the sense that it has not yet been clearly articulated or addressed before in the philosophical literature. However, the argument is closely related to two more familiar varieties of argument currently receiving philosophical attention, namely: (i) arguments from religious diversity, and (ii) naturalistic debunking arguments (e.g. Freudian, Marxist, and evolutionary). I set out the X-claim argument, show that it has some prima facie plausibility, distinguish it from these other two arguments with which it might easily be confused, and, finally, explain why it has some significant advantages over these more familiar arguments against religious belief. | ||
| 652 | |a AB:AG:CB | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4751439-5 |0 (DE-627)372510116 |0 (DE-576)216042615 |2 gnd |a Religiöse Überzeugung |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4002899-9 |0 (DE-627)106391631 |0 (DE-576)208849173 |2 gnd |a Argumentation |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 700 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks |0 (DE-588)1077794924 |0 (DE-627)837511097 |0 (DE-576)44668130X |4 ant |a Ruloff, C. P. |d 1967- | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 54(2018), 1, Seite 15-35 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:54 |g year:2018 |g number:1 |g pages:15-35 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik in |a Ruloff, C. P., 1967 - |t The X-Claim Debunking Argument and Theistic Mooreanism |d 2023 |w (DE-627)1858404924 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/8E1683E5119493A0F77DCB12F3CE2498 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412516000330 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2999147341 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 156980480X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20190304173000 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 180213||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043229 |a AG | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043768 |a CB | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Argumantation,Reasoning,Religious conviction |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Argumentation,Raisonnement,Conviction religieuse |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Argumentación,Convicción religiosa |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Argomentazione,Convinzione religiosa |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 论据 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 論據 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Argumentação,Convicção religiosa |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Аргументация,Религиозное убеждение |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Επιχειρηματολογία,Θρησκευτική πεποίθηση |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Argumentieren |