Religious education and religious choice
According to the "religious choice case" for compulsory religious education, pupils have a right to be made aware of the religious and irreligious paths open to them and equipped with the wherewithal to choose between them. A familiar objection to this argument is that the idea of religiou...
Published in: | Journal of beliefs and values |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Routledge
[2015]
|
In: |
Journal of beliefs and values
|
RelBib Classification: | AA Study of religion AH Religious education |
Further subjects: | B
religious choice
B doxastic voluntarism B Religious Education B Religious Belief B leap of faith B Personal Autonomy |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1571314830 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20180322073040.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180322s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/13617672.2015.1013817 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1571314830 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)501314830 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ501314830 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1148165886 |0 (DE-627)1008153478 |0 (DE-576)496275542 |4 aut |a Hand, Michael | |
109 | |a Hand, Michael | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Religious education and religious choice |c Michael Hand (School of Education, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK) |
264 | 1 | |c [2015] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a According to the "religious choice case" for compulsory religious education, pupils have a right to be made aware of the religious and irreligious paths open to them and equipped with the wherewithal to choose between them. A familiar objection to this argument is that the idea of religious choice reduces religion to a matter of taste. I argue, first, that this familiar objection fails and, second, that we nevertheless have good reason to reject the religious choice case. Religious and irreligious views have a core cognitive dimension that makes it inappropriate to talk of choosing between them. What I have elsewhere called the "possibility-of-truth case" remains the strongest justification for compulsory religious education. | ||
650 | 4 | |a doxastic voluntarism | |
650 | 4 | |a leap of faith | |
650 | 4 | |a Personal Autonomy | |
650 | 4 | |a Religious Belief | |
650 | 4 | |a religious choice | |
650 | 4 | |a Religious Education | |
652 | |a AA:AH | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of beliefs and values |d Abingdon : Routledge, 1980 |g 36(2015), 1, Seite 31-39 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320634914 |w (DE-600)2024386-8 |w (DE-576)094752656 |x 1469-9362 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:36 |g year:2015 |g number:1 |g pages:31-39 |
856 | |u http://pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/20010463/Hand_religious_education_and_religious_choice_2015_Post_Print.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2015.1013817 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
936 | u | w | |d 36 |j 2015 |e 1 |h 31-39 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3003869922 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1571314830 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20190510134902 | ||
LOK | |0 008 180322||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042966 |a AA | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550364804 |a AH | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |