Misrepresenting religious education's past and present in looking forward: gearon using Kuhn's concepts of paradigm, paradigm shift and incommensurability

In looking to the future, some writers on religious education (RE) have attempted to evaluate current approaches to the subject. Some have characterised any significant change in approach as a "paradigm shift", a term derived from Thomas Kuhn's work in the philosophy of science. This...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Jackson, Bob 1949- (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Routledge [2015]
In: Journal of beliefs and values
Jahr: 2015, Band: 36, Heft: 1, Seiten: 64-78
RelBib Classification:AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus
AH Religionspädagogik
weitere Schlagwörter:B paradigmatic disciplines
B Paradigm
B Incommensurability
B religious education (RE)
B pedagogies
B Paradigm Shift
Online Zugang: Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang
Volltext (Verlag)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In looking to the future, some writers on religious education (RE) have attempted to evaluate current approaches to the subject. Some have characterised any significant change in approach as a "paradigm shift", a term derived from Thomas Kuhn's work in the philosophy of science. This article examines the uses of the terms "paradigm", "paradigm shift" and "incommensurability" in Liam Gearon's book MasterClass in Religious Education. I argue that Gearon misapplies Kuhn's concepts, that his own account of paradigms of RE is internally inconsistent, and that his discussion - partly through placing the views of others within a rigid framework of constructed paradigms - contains some misrepresentations of their work. The critique is pertinent to the debate about the nature and future of RE for, if evaluations of present and past models of RE are defective, their use in re-thinking the shape and content of the subject is highly questionable.
ISSN:1469-9362
Bezug:Kritik in "Paradigm shift in religious education (2018)"
Enthält:Enthalten in: Journal of beliefs and values
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/13617672.2015.1014651