Bodies, Biopolitics, and Mushrooms Once Again: A Response to Donovan Schaefer
In this short essay, I respond to Donovan Schaefer's response to my paper, "Do Mushrooms Have Religion, Too?" Continuing the line of critique originally formulated, I suggest that Schaefer's exclusion of non-animal life from the realm of bodies conceals a biopolitical decision.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Equinox
[2017]
|
In: |
Bulletin for the study of religion
Year: 2017, Volume: 46, Issue: 3/4, Pages: 45-46 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Schaefer, Donovan O. 1981-, Religious affects
/ Biopolitics
|
RelBib Classification: | AA Study of religion AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1571703519 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20190415155207.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180404s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1558/bsor.33415 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1571703519 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)501703519 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ501703519 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)105911769X |0 (DE-627)798008520 |0 (DE-576)404969801 |4 aut |a Phelps, Hollis | |
109 | |a Phelps, Hollis | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Bodies, Biopolitics, and Mushrooms Once Again |b A Response to Donovan Schaefer |c Hollis Phelps |
264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a In this short essay, I respond to Donovan Schaefer's response to my paper, "Do Mushrooms Have Religion, Too?" Continuing the line of critique originally formulated, I suggest that Schaefer's exclusion of non-animal life from the realm of bodies conceals a biopolitical decision. | ||
601 | |a Biopolitik | ||
652 | |a AA:AB | ||
689 | 0 | 0 | |d u |0 (DE-588)1183631723 |0 (DE-627)1663261970 |0 (DE-576)455766258 |a Schaefer, Donovan O. |2 gnd |d 1981- |t Religious affects |
689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4137810-6 |0 (DE-627)105647276 |0 (DE-576)209680768 |2 gnd |a Biopolitik |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bulletin for the study of religion |d London : Equinox, 2010 |g 46(2017), 3/4, Seite 45-46 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)622089064 |w (DE-600)2545121-2 |w (DE-576)329536249 |x 2041-1871 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:46 |g year:2017 |g number:3/4 |g pages:45-46 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.equinoxpub.com/journals/index.php/BSOR/article/view/33415 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1558/bsor.33415 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3004928159 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1571703519 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20190412121057 | ||
LOK | |0 008 180404||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042966 |a AA | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Biopolitics |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Biopolitique |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Biopolítica |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Biopolitica |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 生物政治学 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 生物政治學 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Biopolítica |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Биополитика |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Βιοπολιτική |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Biopouvoir,Bio-Macht,Biomacht,Politische Wissenschaft |