A Tree with Many Branches: Abrahamic Approaches to Interreligious Dialogue
While dialogue is critically necessary in the modern world, it raises a host of epistemological, theological, and metaphysical problems. If a religious practitioner regards her tradition as absolutely true, must she then regard other traditions as false or derivative, either wholly or in part? Is ge...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Peeters
[2017]
|
| In: |
Studies in interreligious dialogue
Year: 2017, Volume: 27, Issue: 1, Pages: 25-44 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Judaism
/ Christianity
/ Islam
/ Interfaith dialogue
/ Religion
/ Disparity
/ Trees (Motif)
B Interfaith dialogue / Inclusivism / Exclusivism / Pluralism / Particularism (Theology) |
| RelBib Classification: | AX Inter-religious relations BH Judaism BJ Islam CC Christianity and Non-Christian religion; Inter-religious relations |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | While dialogue is critically necessary in the modern world, it raises a host of epistemological, theological, and metaphysical problems. If a religious practitioner regards her tradition as absolutely true, must she then regard other traditions as false or derivative, either wholly or in part? Is genuine dialogue actually possible, or is it just a show of conciliation and unity against a backdrop of irreconcilable differences? The first section of this essay surveys four modern models of interreligious dialogue: exclusivism, inclusivism, pluralism, and particularism. None of them will prove satisfactory. The second section sketches out an interreligious approach to truth by spinning together three conceptual threads: truth (ἀλήθεια) in the Gospel of John, love in Hasdai Crescas's Or Adonai, and imagination in the work of Muhyi al-Din Ibn al-'Arabi. It will be argued that interreligious truth is not a matter of resolving contradictory truth claims; rather, it is a hermeneutical process involving imaginative encounters across traditions. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1783-1806 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Studies in interreligious dialogue
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2143/SID.27.1.3275090 |