The Sefer as a Challenge to Reception Theories
The talmudic sages granted the legal status of sefer (book) to five texts: the Torah, tefillin, the get, the mezuzah, and the Scroll of Esther. These texts share two features: they have a ritualistic format and use, and they are the only sacred texts that demonstrate mise en abyme—the trait of liter...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2018
|
In: |
The journal of Jewish thought & philosophy
Year: 2018, Volume: 26, Issue: 1, Pages: 67-93 |
Further subjects: | B
Deleuze
Gadamer
ontology
rabbinics
literary theory
mise en abyme
open work
scriptures
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1574237004 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20201222130033.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180508s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/1477285X-12341296 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1574237004 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)504237004 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ504237004 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Dickmann, Iddo |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Sefer as a Challenge to Reception Theories |
264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The talmudic sages granted the legal status of sefer (book) to five texts: the Torah, tefillin, the get, the mezuzah, and the Scroll of Esther. These texts share two features: they have a ritualistic format and use, and they are the only sacred texts that demonstrate mise en abyme—the trait of literary self-containing. These two traits turn the rabbinic book into a radical case of “open work”: the sefer consists of both textual signs and the actual body of an empirical reader; its pragmatic level is not bracketed out in favor of the semiotic one. I argue that Deleuze’s reception theory best accounts for the sefer. | ||
601 | |a Challenger | ||
650 | 4 | |a Deleuze |x Gadamer |x ontology |x rabbinics |x literary theory |x mise en abyme |x open work |x scriptures | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t The journal of Jewish thought & philosophy |d Leiden [u.a.] : Brill, 1991 |g 26(2018), 1, Seite 67-93 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341900427 |w (DE-600)2069783-1 |w (DE-576)273871781 |x 1477-285X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:26 |g year:2018 |g number:1 |g pages:67-93 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1477285X-12341296 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3008165087 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1574237004 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20180508033405 | ||
LOK | |0 008 180508||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |