How Do We Recognize God
There are three main ways to acquire the knowledge of the existence of God and the knowledge of His nature. These are either the arguments taking into account the nature of the world and our thinking about the world, or it is the argumentation trying to prove the authenticity of certain historical e...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2018]
|
In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2018, Volume: 10, Issue: 1, Pages: 117-128 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Christian philosophy
/ God
/ Recognizing
/ Epistemological contextualism
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God |
Further subjects: | B
Divine Nature
B Cognition B God |
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 157527910X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240316100352.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180517s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.24204/ejpr.v10i1.1916 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)157527910X | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)50527910X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ50527910X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1048746526 |0 (DE-627)781219965 |0 (DE-576)169202240 |4 aut |a Judycki, Stanisław |d 1954- | |
109 | |a Judycki, Stanisław 1954- | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a How Do We Recognize God |c Stanislaw Judycki |
264 | 1 | |c [2018] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a There are three main ways to acquire the knowledge of the existence of God and the knowledge of His nature. These are either the arguments taking into account the nature of the world and our thinking about the world, or it is the argumentation trying to prove the authenticity of certain historical events, or it is a reference to particular types of experiences, called mystical experiences. In the case of Christian philosophy we will have to consider, firstly, the cosmological and ontological arguments for the existence of God, and, secondly, the attempts to show the authenticity of reports of the events regarding Jesus of Nazareth and, thirdly, the arguments in favor of the objectivity of mystical experiences recorded in the history of Christian religion. In regard to all of the above-mentioned three sources of knowledge about God, I would like to ask the following questions. How do we know that all of them refer to the same object? On what basis can we say that even if these three 'ways to God' are correct, they refer us to the same being? Are they independent of each other, and if they depend on each other in some way, what are the relationships among them? If we were not able to demonstrate that the item referred to by the term 'God' in all of these three ways is the same object or being, it would represent a significant weakness in Christian theology and philosophy. I will try to outline what relationship may exist between these three sources of knowledge about God. Then I will attempt to describe the criteria connecting all these sources of knowledge. | ||
650 | 4 | |a God | |
650 | 4 | |a Cognition | |
650 | 4 | |a Divine Nature | |
652 | |a AB:NBC | ||
689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4113224-5 |0 (DE-627)105830976 |0 (DE-576)20947470X |2 gnd |a Christliche Philosophie |
689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4021662-7 |0 (DE-627)104649747 |0 (DE-576)208939261 |2 gnd |a Gott |
689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4133600-8 |0 (DE-627)105678953 |0 (DE-576)20964527X |2 gnd |a Erkennen |
689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4998367-2 |0 (DE-627)504487566 |0 (DE-576)253204305 |2 gnd |a Epistemologischer Kontextualismus |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal for philosophy of religion |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009 |g 10(2018), 1, Seite 117-128 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)718600770 |w (DE-600)2659606-4 |w (DE-576)477533728 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:10 |g year:2018 |g number:1 |g pages:117-128 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/1916 |x Verlag |z teilw. kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v10i1.1916 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3009734247 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 157527910X | ||
LOK | |0 005 20180820170358 | ||
LOK | |0 008 180517||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Christian philosophy,Epistemological contextualism,God,God,Recognizing,Identifying |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Contextualisme épistémologique,Dieu,Dieu,Philosophie chrétienne,Recognition,Reconnaissance,Reconnaissance |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Contextualismo epistemológico,Dios,Dios,Filosofía cristiana,Reconocer |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Contestualismo epistemologico,Dio,Dio,Filosofia cristiana,Riconoscere,Conoscenza,Conoscenza |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 基督教哲学,神,神,上帝,上帝,认识到,看出,认出 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 基督教哲學,神,神,上帝,上帝,認識到,看出,認出 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Contextualismo epistemológico,Deus,Deus,Filosofia cristã,Reconhecer |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Бог (мотив),Бог,Осознание,Христианская философия,Эпистемологический контекстуализм |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Αναγνώριση,Επιστημολογικός συγκειμενισμός,Θεός (μοτίβο),Θεός,Χριστιανική φιλοσοφία |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Christentum , Playing God , Erkennungsprozess , Kontextualismus |