Legal Aspects of Scientific Misconduct: Causes and Possible Solutions

The present contribution reports the results of an anonymous survey of 249 researchers, ranging from students to professors, regarding their perceptions of scientific misconduct. The participants were sourced from the University of Novi Sad (70%), and from the Universities of Vienna, Prague and Stut...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Strgar, Sanja S. (Author) ; Vukadinovic, Maja S. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Peeters [2018]
In: Ethical perspectives
Year: 2018, Volume: 25, Issue: 1, Pages: 117-141
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Scientist / Deviance / Science ethics / Infraction / Fraud / Law
RelBib Classification:NCJ Ethics of science
XA Law
Online Access: Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1575788683
003 DE-627
005 20180920115001.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180529s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2143/EP.25.1.3284675  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1575788683 
035 |a (DE-576)505788683 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ505788683 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Strgar, Sanja S.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Legal Aspects of Scientific Misconduct  |b Causes and Possible Solutions  |c Sanja S. Strgar 
264 1 |c [2018] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The present contribution reports the results of an anonymous survey of 249 researchers, ranging from students to professors, regarding their perceptions of scientific misconduct. The participants were sourced from the University of Novi Sad (70%), and from the Universities of Vienna, Prague and Stuttgart. The results indicated that 78% of the participants have personal knowledge of scientific misconduct committed by another person, while 20.9% have been personally affected by scientific misconduct. The results also show that the most frequently observed types of misconduct in the domain of science are: plagiarism, falsification, manipulation and the fabrication of data. More than one half of all participants recognized a lack of supervision as a reason for the emergence of scientific misconduct. The factors contributing to scientific misconduct include time pressure, inadequate oversight and the absence of legal consequences. Accordingly, the majority favoured greater supervision, institutional oversight, including random checks, and new legal regulations to reduce the incidence of scientific misconduct. 
652 |a NCJ:XA 
689 0 0 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4066567-7  |0 (DE-627)104331712  |0 (DE-576)209165146  |2 gnd  |a Wissenschaftler 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4000320-6  |0 (DE-627)106401556  |0 (DE-576)208837620  |2 gnd  |a Abweichendes Verhalten 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4066602-5  |0 (DE-627)104589523  |0 (DE-576)209165278  |2 gnd  |a Wissenschaftsethik 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4191182-9  |0 (DE-627)105244066  |0 (DE-576)210071796  |2 gnd  |a Zuwiderhandlung 
689 0 4 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4006249-1  |0 (DE-627)106378236  |0 (DE-576)208864784  |2 gnd  |a Betrug 
689 0 5 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4048737-4  |0 (DE-627)106189719  |0 (DE-576)20907907X  |2 gnd  |a Recht 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
700 1 |a Vukadinovic, Maja S.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical perspectives  |d Leuven : Peeters, 1994  |g 25(2018), 1, Seite 117-141  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)389126381  |w (DE-600)2148229-9  |w (DE-576)112891179  |x 1783-1431  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:25  |g year:2018  |g number:1  |g pages:117-141 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.2143/EP.25.1.3284675  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3010580827 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1575788683 
LOK |0 005 20180608093403 
LOK |0 008 180529||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736582  |a NCJ 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053798  |a XA 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Deviance,Social deviance,Misbehavior,Fraud,Fraud,Infraction,Contravention,Contravention,Law,Law,Right,Law,Jurisprudence,Law in literature,Science ethics,Ethics of science,Science,Scientist,Researcher,Scholar,Scholars 
STB 0 0 |a Droit,Droit,Déviance,Fraude,Fraude,Infraction,Violation,Violation,Scientifique <masc.>,Chercheur,Chercheur,Savants,Chercheurs,Éthique de la science,Éthique des sciences,Éthique des sciences 
STC 0 0 |a Científico,Comportamiento desviado,Derecho,Derecho,Fraude,Fraude,Infracción,Ética de las ciencias 
STD 0 0 |a Comportamento deviante,Contravvenzione,Infrazione,Infrazione,Diritto,Diritto,Etica della scienza,Frode <motivo>,Frode,Inganno,Inganno,Inganno (motivo),Inganno,Scienziato,Studioso,Studioso 
STE 0 0 |a 偏差行为,学者,欺骗,欺诈,法律,法律,法制,法制,科学伦理 
STF 0 0 |a 偏差行為,學者,欺騙,欺詐,法律,法律,法制,法制,科學倫理 
STG 0 0 |a Cientista,Comportamento desviante,Direito,Direito,Fraude,Fraude,Infração,Ética das ciências 
STH 0 0 |a Аномальное поведение,Нарушение,Обман (мотив),Обман,Право (мотив),Право,Учёный (мужчина),Этика науки 
STI 0 0 |a Απάτη <μοτίβο>,Απάτη,Εξαπάτηση,Εξαπάτηση (μοτίβο),Αποκλίνουσα συμπεριφορά,Δίκαιο (μοτίβο),Δίκαιο,Επιστήμονας,Επιστημονική ηθική,Ηθική της επιστήμης,Παράβαση 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Forscher,Wissenschaftler,Wissenschaftliche Elite , Abnormes Verhalten,Deviantes Verhalten,Devianz,Dissoziales Verhalten,Dissozialität,Fehlverhalten,Soziale Abweichung,Verhaltensabweichung,Problemverhalten , Wissenschaft,Forschungsethik,Forschung , Verstoß , Schwindel 

Similar Items

more