Legal Aspects of Scientific Misconduct: Causes and Possible Solutions
The present contribution reports the results of an anonymous survey of 249 researchers, ranging from students to professors, regarding their perceptions of scientific misconduct. The participants were sourced from the University of Novi Sad (70%), and from the Universities of Vienna, Prague and Stut...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Peeters
[2018]
|
In: |
Ethical perspectives
Year: 2018, Volume: 25, Issue: 1, Pages: 117-141 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Scientist
/ Deviance
/ Science ethics
/ Infraction
/ Fraud
/ Law
|
RelBib Classification: | NCJ Ethics of science XA Law |
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1575788683 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20180920115001.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180529s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.2143/EP.25.1.3284675 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1575788683 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)505788683 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ505788683 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Strgar, Sanja S. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Legal Aspects of Scientific Misconduct |b Causes and Possible Solutions |c Sanja S. Strgar |
264 | 1 | |c [2018] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The present contribution reports the results of an anonymous survey of 249 researchers, ranging from students to professors, regarding their perceptions of scientific misconduct. The participants were sourced from the University of Novi Sad (70%), and from the Universities of Vienna, Prague and Stuttgart. The results indicated that 78% of the participants have personal knowledge of scientific misconduct committed by another person, while 20.9% have been personally affected by scientific misconduct. The results also show that the most frequently observed types of misconduct in the domain of science are: plagiarism, falsification, manipulation and the fabrication of data. More than one half of all participants recognized a lack of supervision as a reason for the emergence of scientific misconduct. The factors contributing to scientific misconduct include time pressure, inadequate oversight and the absence of legal consequences. Accordingly, the majority favoured greater supervision, institutional oversight, including random checks, and new legal regulations to reduce the incidence of scientific misconduct. | ||
652 | |a NCJ:XA | ||
689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4066567-7 |0 (DE-627)104331712 |0 (DE-576)209165146 |2 gnd |a Wissenschaftler |
689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4000320-6 |0 (DE-627)106401556 |0 (DE-576)208837620 |2 gnd |a Abweichendes Verhalten |
689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4066602-5 |0 (DE-627)104589523 |0 (DE-576)209165278 |2 gnd |a Wissenschaftsethik |
689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4191182-9 |0 (DE-627)105244066 |0 (DE-576)210071796 |2 gnd |a Zuwiderhandlung |
689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4006249-1 |0 (DE-627)106378236 |0 (DE-576)208864784 |2 gnd |a Betrug |
689 | 0 | 5 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4048737-4 |0 (DE-627)106189719 |0 (DE-576)20907907X |2 gnd |a Recht |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
700 | 1 | |a Vukadinovic, Maja S. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical perspectives |d Leuven : Peeters, 1994 |g 25(2018), 1, Seite 117-141 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)389126381 |w (DE-600)2148229-9 |w (DE-576)112891179 |x 1783-1431 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:2018 |g number:1 |g pages:117-141 |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.2143/EP.25.1.3284675 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3010580827 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1575788683 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20180608093403 | ||
LOK | |0 008 180529||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736582 |a NCJ | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053798 |a XA | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Deviance,Social deviance,Misbehavior,Fraud,Fraud,Infraction,Contravention,Contravention,Law,Law,Right,Law,Jurisprudence,Law in literature,Science ethics,Ethics of science,Science,Scientist,Researcher,Scholar,Scholars |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Droit,Droit,Déviance,Fraude,Fraude,Infraction,Violation,Violation,Scientifique <masc.>,Chercheur,Chercheur,Savants,Chercheurs,Éthique de la science,Éthique des sciences,Éthique des sciences |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Científico,Comportamiento desviado,Derecho,Derecho,Fraude,Fraude,Infracción,Ética de las ciencias |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Comportamento deviante,Contravvenzione,Infrazione,Infrazione,Diritto,Diritto,Etica della scienza,Frode <motivo>,Frode,Inganno,Inganno,Inganno (motivo),Inganno,Scienziato,Studioso,Studioso |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 偏差行为,学者,欺骗,欺诈,法律,法律,法制,法制,科学伦理 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 偏差行為,學者,欺騙,欺詐,法律,法律,法制,法制,科學倫理 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Cientista,Comportamento desviante,Direito,Direito,Fraude,Fraude,Infração,Ética das ciências |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Аномальное поведение,Нарушение,Обман (мотив),Обман,Право (мотив),Право,Учёный (мужчина),Этика науки |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Απάτη <μοτίβο>,Απάτη,Εξαπάτηση,Εξαπάτηση (μοτίβο),Αποκλίνουσα συμπεριφορά,Δίκαιο (μοτίβο),Δίκαιο,Επιστήμονας,Επιστημονική ηθική,Ηθική της επιστήμης,Παράβαση |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Forscher,Wissenschaftler,Wissenschaftliche Elite , Abnormes Verhalten,Deviantes Verhalten,Devianz,Dissoziales Verhalten,Dissozialität,Fehlverhalten,Soziale Abweichung,Verhaltensabweichung,Problemverhalten , Wissenschaft,Forschungsethik,Forschung , Verstoß , Schwindel |