An Initial Response to the Call for Reframing the History of New Religious Movements
In response to Nova Religio articles by Andreas Pietsch and Sita Steckel, Michael Driedger, and Johannes C. Wolfart calling for a reframing of new religious movements by new religions scholars, agreement is offered that new religions studies will be well served by incorporating insights from scholar...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
University of Californiarnia Press
[2018]
|
In: |
Nova religio
Year: 2018, Volume: 21, Issue: 4, Pages: 88-95 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
New religion
/ Historiography
|
RelBib Classification: | AA Study of religion AZ New religious movements |
Further subjects: | B
new religions studies
B New Religious Movements B Religious Diversity B Apocalypticism B Religious Violence |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | In response to Nova Religio articles by Andreas Pietsch and Sita Steckel, Michael Driedger, and Johannes C. Wolfart calling for a reframing of new religious movements by new religions scholars, agreement is offered that new religions studies will be well served by incorporating insights from scholars of new religious movements and sectarian movements of the late medieval and Reformation eras, as well as by recasting assumptions that associate apocalyptic movements with violence. It is also suggested that a more sophisticated assessment of pluralism in previous centuries and more attention to methodological issues will provide a firmer foundation for current claims of a growing religious diversity in the contemporary world. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1541-8480 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Nova religio
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1525/nr.2018.21.4.88 |