Charismatic Cultures
While confirming Heuser and Klaus’s twenty-year-old warning about the shadow side of charismatic leadership in pentecostal organizations, the article points out the leader-centric bias in this and similar works and seeks to advance the discussion by addressing charismatic leadership from a structure...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2018
|
In: |
Pneuma
Year: 2018, Volume: 40, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 109-129 |
RelBib Classification: | KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history KDG Free church NBG Pneumatology; Holy Spirit NBN Ecclesiology |
Further subjects: | B
Pentecostal
charisma
leadership
agency / structure
ethical leadership
culture
|
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) |
Summary: | While confirming Heuser and Klaus’s twenty-year-old warning about the shadow side of charismatic leadership in pentecostal organizations, the article points out the leader-centric bias in this and similar works and seeks to advance the discussion by addressing charismatic leadership from a structure/agency perspective. Drawing on Margaret Archer’s critical realist framework, the authors go beyond the focus on the sole charismatic leader to suggest that all partners in the leadership relation bear responsibility for avoiding destructive charismatic cultures and promoting ethical agency. The study proposes that it is possible to have forms of charismatic leadership that reflect pentecostal characteristics without being destructive if organizations promote reflexivity, ethical policies and moral accountability, and active followership. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1570-0747 |
Contains: | In: Pneuma
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700747-04001002 |