Inside Looking In: Complicity and Critique
Although postsecular criticism seems dedicated to the deconstruction of an untenable religious/secular binary, the discourse harbors an unacknowledged complicity with the very terms we attempt to deconstruct. Responding to challenges by Tracy Fessenden and Laura Levitt, the essay recommends what Gay...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Johns Hopkins University Press
[2018]
|
In: |
Christianity & literature
Year: 2018, Volume: 67, Issue: 3, Pages: 511-518 |
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism TJ Modern history |
Further subjects: | B
complicity critique
B LEVITT, Laura B Literary Studies B Literature B Postsecularism B Religion B Identification (religion) B RELIGION & literature B SPIVAK, Gayatri Chakravorty, 1942- B FESSENDEN, Tracy B Postsecular |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Although postsecular criticism seems dedicated to the deconstruction of an untenable religious/secular binary, the discourse harbors an unacknowledged complicity with the very terms we attempt to deconstruct. Responding to challenges by Tracy Fessenden and Laura Levitt, the essay recommends what Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak names a productive acknowledgment of complicity for postsecular studies. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2056-5666 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Christianity & literature
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0148333117731581 |