Freiheit und Bindung des Willens in Hermann Cohens Ethik und Religionsphilosophie

Martin Luther's significance for the modern history of freedom is a theme of Hermann Cohen's ethics and his shorter writings from the Reformation memorial year of 1917. For this reason it is worth asking what this neo-Kantian Jewish philosopher had to say about the bondage of the will, the...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dober, Hans Martin 1959- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht [2018]
In: Kerygma und Dogma
Year: 2018, Volume: 64, Issue: 2, Pages: 116-137
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Cohen, Hermann 1842-1918 / Luther, Martin 1483-1546 / Free will / Ethics / Religion
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
KAG Church history 1500-1648; Reformation; humanism; Renaissance
KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history
KDD Protestant Church
NBE Anthropology
NCA Ethics
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Rights Information:InC 1.0
Description
Summary:Martin Luther's significance for the modern history of freedom is a theme of Hermann Cohen's ethics and his shorter writings from the Reformation memorial year of 1917. For this reason it is worth asking what this neo-Kantian Jewish philosopher had to say about the bondage of the will, the main theme of De servo arbitrio. Cohen's ethics gives the Kantian concept of autonomy a contemporary expression, and his late philosophy of religion continues the critique of Augustine's theology of predestination with its traces in Luther's response to Erasmus. Finally, Religion of Reason: Out of the Sources of Judaism develops a new interpretation of the reconciliation of sinful humanity to God that is near to the Lutheran concept of simul justus et peccator.
ISSN:2196-8020
Contains:Enthalten in: Kerygma und Dogma
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.13109/kedo.2018.64.2.116
DOI: 10.15496/publikation-93498
HDL: 10900/152159