The Paradoxical Religiosity Effect: Religion and Politics in Indonesia and the United States
We argue that personal religiosity and political religiosity are distinct attributes of a political candidate. Personal religiosity reflects a candidate's level of personal religious commitment and political religiosity reflects the candidate's policy regarding separating versus blending r...
| Authors: | ; ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2016]
|
| In: |
Politics and religion
Year: 2016, Volume: 9, Issue: 3, Pages: 481-507 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 157752098X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230801150450.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180711s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S175504831500053X |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)157752098X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)50752098X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ50752098X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1147195676 |0 (DE-627)100855250X |0 (DE-576)421130687 |4 aut |a Sumaktoyo, Nathanael Gratias | |
| 109 | |a Sumaktoyo, Nathanael Gratias |a Sumaktoyo, Nathanael G. |a Sumaktoyo, Nathanael | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Paradoxical Religiosity Effect |b Religion and Politics in Indonesia and the United States |c Nathanael Gratias Sumaktoyo |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2016] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a We argue that personal religiosity and political religiosity are distinct attributes of a political candidate. Personal religiosity reflects a candidate's level of personal religious commitment and political religiosity reflects the candidate's policy regarding separating versus blending religion and politics. The paradoxical religiosity hypothesis predicts that, within a democracy, personal religiosity will increase voters' endorsement of a candidate whereas political religiosity will decrease voters' endorsement. We test this hypothesis comparatively in two experiments, one performed within a long-standing democracy containing predominantly Christian voters (the United States), and the other within a more recent democracy containing predominantly Muslim voters (Indonesia). We demonstrate the robustness of the paradoxical religiosity effect and its persistence across the two countries, suggesting that Muslim Indonesians are no less capable than Christian Americans in separating the sacred and the secular. | ||
| 601 | |a Religion | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Ottati, Victor |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Untoro, Vinaya |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Politics and religion |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 2008 |g 9(2016), 3, Seite 481-507 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)560846134 |w (DE-600)2417736-2 |w (DE-576)29433923X |x 1755-0491 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:9 |g year:2016 |g number:3 |g pages:481-507 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-religion/article/paradoxical-religiosity-effect-religion-and-politics-in-indonesia-and-the-united-states/F5A937F2E8A7EC2650D112EC30159621 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S175504831500053X |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3017337472 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 157752098X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180711163514 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 180711||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||