Goods and Groups: Thomistic Social Action and Metaphysics

Hans Bernhard Schmid has argued that contemporary theories of collective action and social metaphysics unnecessarily reject the concept of a “shared intentional state.” I will argue that three neo-Thomist philosophers, Jacques Maritain, Charles de Koninck, and Yves Simon, all seem to agree that the...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rooney, James Dominic (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: [publisher not identified] [2016]
In: Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association
Year: 2016, Volume: 90, Pages: 287-297
RelBib Classification:KDB Roman Catholic Church
NCC Social ethics
NCD Political ethics
VA Philosophy
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1578187222
003 DE-627
005 20180802102520.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180802s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.5840/acpaproc201822879  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1578187222 
035 |a (DE-576)508187222 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ508187222 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1042549907  |0 (DE-627)769103456  |0 (DE-576)394026683  |4 aut  |a Rooney, James Dominic 
109 |a Rooney, James Dominic  |a Rooney, Alan Christian  |a Ni Jia Daoming 
245 1 0 |a Goods and Groups  |b Thomistic Social Action and Metaphysics  |c James Dominic Rooney 
264 1 |c [2016] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Hans Bernhard Schmid has argued that contemporary theories of collective action and social metaphysics unnecessarily reject the concept of a “shared intentional state.” I will argue that three neo-Thomist philosophers, Jacques Maritain, Charles de Koninck, and Yves Simon, all seem to agree that the goals of certain kinds of collective agency cannot be analyzed merely in terms of intentional states of individuals. This was prompted by a controversy over the nature of the “common good,” in response to a perceived threat from “personalist” theories of political life. Common goods, as these three authors analyze them, ground our collective action in pursuit of certain kinds of goals which are immanent to social activity itself. Their analysis can support an alternate position to “intentional individualism,” providing an account of collective practical reasoning and social metaphysics based on shared intentional states, but without involving implausible “group minds.” 
601 |a Metaphysik 
652 |a KDB:NCC:NCD:VA 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a American Catholic Philosophical Association  |t Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association  |d Washington, DC : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 1926  |g 90(2016), Seite 287-297  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)376274395  |w (DE-600)2130243-1  |w (DE-576)443083517  |x 2153-7925  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:90  |g year:2016  |g pages:287-297 
856 4 0 |u http://www.pdcnet.org/oom/service?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=&rft.imuse_id=acpaproc_2016_0090_0287_0297&svc_id=info:www.pdcnet.org/collection  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.5840/acpaproc201822879  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3020078369 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1578187222 
LOK |0 005 20181123105603 
LOK |0 008 180802||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442049839  |a KDB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205283X  |a NCC 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052856  |a NCD 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL