Sanctuary and the Limits of Public Reason: A Deweyan Corrective
This article contributes to the debate over the appropriate place of religion in public reason by showing the limits of this framework for understanding and evaluating the real-world religious political activism of social movements. Using the 1980s Sanctuary Movement as a central case study, I show...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2018]
|
In: |
Politics and religion
Year: 2018, Volume: 11, Issue: 3, Pages: 498-521 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1578382211 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230801145545.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180808s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S1755048317000682 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1578382211 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)508382211 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ508382211 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Steinmetz, Alicia |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Sanctuary and the Limits of Public Reason |b A Deweyan Corrective |c Alicia Steinmetz |
264 | 1 | |c [2018] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This article contributes to the debate over the appropriate place of religion in public reason by showing the limits of this framework for understanding and evaluating the real-world religious political activism of social movements. Using the 1980s Sanctuary Movement as a central case study, I show how public reason fails to appreciate the complex religious dynamics of this movement, the reasons actors employ religious reasoning, and, as a result, the very meaning of these acts. In response, I argue that a Deweyan perspective on the tasks and challenges of the democratic public offers a richer, more contextualized approach to evaluating the status of religion in the public sphere as well as other emerging publics whose modes of engagement defy prevailing notions of reasonableness and civility. | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Politics and religion |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 2008 |g 11(2018), 3, Seite 498-521 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)560846134 |w (DE-600)2417736-2 |w (DE-576)29433923X |x 1755-0491 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2018 |g number:3 |g pages:498-521 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-religion/article/sanctuary-and-the-limits-of-public-reason-a-deweyan-corrective/CEA2660EC2C31F2AC3FB83515538DF5A |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048317000682 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3020435935 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1578382211 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20180808132213 | ||
LOK | |0 008 180808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |